|
|
|
 |

December 5th, 2010, 12:30 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 20
Thanks: 2
Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Assimilation (Conquered Lands)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colonial
Ulm would be screwed, rather. man would be fine...
|
MA Ulm's units are all high-resource, so you don't get all that much unit diversity from them, and their magic isn't the best. MA Caelum, on the other hand, with low-resource flying archers (ie, high-availability) and good air mages...
By which I mean to say, it's not always balanced with juicy nations being more inviting to conquer. In fact, I should probably re-balance it a little if I get some time at some point. Version 1.1 or somesuch, with Late maybe. 
|

December 5th, 2010, 05:11 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 45
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Assimilation (Conquered Lands)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azurain
By which I mean to say, it's not always balanced with juicy nations being more inviting to conquer. In fact, I should probably re-balance it a little if I get some time at some point. Version 1.1 or somesuch, with Late maybe. 
|
Actually it's most of a balance mechanisme with the most powerfull nation being the most interesting targets. The main problem would be with nations that have specific interesting units without being that powerfull (Caelum for flying units of course, nations that have unusual cross path, ...)
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|