MP NewbsWithLowSelfEsteem - Year 8: A Dance with Illithids

Finalgenesis · #1 February 10th, 2011, 04:11 AM

Nothing too drastic, let's say 50% site freq? EA is 45% base anyhow so 50% won't be too drastic a change. But actually I'm okay with whichever site frequency, as I've never played with a low site freq before.

Otherwise I look forward to trying my 1st hammerless game so I can accrue some actual experience on the debate...

Admiral_Aorta · #2 February 10th, 2011, 04:21 AM

50% sounds good.

Soyweiser · #3 February 10th, 2011, 08:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Finalgenesis

Otherwise I look forward to trying my 1st hammerless game so I can accrue some actual experience on the debate...

Same here

. Not that the lack of experience would stop me!

Also, higher freq is rumored to raises the chance of a successful slave hunt. (I think it is 10 + sitefreq*blood level, in the manual sitefreq is 40).

But remember in a higher site game it mostly means that the endgame is reached quicker. As a gold based economy is easily destroyed by remote attack spells, raiders, overtaxing etc. And gems are forever. (And waaaayyy shiny).