|
|
|
 |
|

September 1st, 2002, 08:07 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
"It says nothing about unfilled slots."
Yes it does. There are multiple tabs on the left side of that screen, click the facilities tab and it will show you the number of facilities each planet has. You can also click on the # of facilties list (top part) and it will sort by that collum.
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

September 1st, 2002, 09:11 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
Quote:
I'm tired of getting Partnership proposals from my partners every turn.
Well that is very strange: I never saw this!!
What Version are you playing??
|
Well, it is a rather odd situation: A PBW game in v1.49 + TDM-ModPack 2.0, AI vs Humans. The two "AIs" that keep sending the proposals are actually human-controlled empires that need a replacement player. (If anyone's interested, the game is "The Evil Within".)
__________________
Cap'n Q
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
|

September 1st, 2002, 10:38 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
Quote:
Originally posted by Elowan:
If there's a way of showing just the 'open-slot' planets -- I haven't found it yet. But wouldn't it be nice if you could set the list so that only undeveloped or partially undeveloped planets would show up?
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Phoenix-D:
... There are multiple tabs on the left side of that screen, click the facilities tab and it will show you the number of facilities each planet has. You can also click on the # of facilties list (top part) and it will sort by that collum.
Phoenix-D
|
Well!! Another du'oh moment brought to you by Mother Nature. Stay tuned for more!!
Thanks! 
[ September 01, 2002, 21:42: Message edited by: Elowan ]
__________________
 'There are old space jockies and bold space jockies but there ain't no old, bold space jockies'
|

September 2nd, 2002, 05:18 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
I see a lot of good ideas on this list. Also a couple of bad ideas, but I'll just ignore them and hope they go away. My thoughts are regarding supply. For more realism, there really shouldn't be an arbitrary "supply" resource. Instead, ships should be forced to carry the same resources that you use elsewhere. For example, a human ship would need minerals for spare parts, which would be used up as time passes, and at an accelerated rate when moving, firing weapons, etc.; radioactives for reactor fuel, used much like minerals; and organics for food, used at a more or less constant rate. This would of course add complexity, but I think it would be cool. Obviously, this would also require physical movement of resources around the empire to make sense, but I like that idea anyway. Especially if you combine it with moddable resources like someone suggested. Or we could keep things simple.
Also, a question. I've created components for ships that produce intel points and research points, but I've never tested them. Do these not work?
__________________
If one binds one's heart firmly and imprisons it one can allow one's spirit many liberties: I have said that before. But no one believes it if he does not already know it...
-Friedrich Nietzsche
|

September 2nd, 2002, 05:29 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
Good idea on the print outs... That would be nice... a nice spread sheet... with the info...
Love reports... and lots of them that are sortable...
But this unique naming system is driving me nuts...
As does the fact that names give away too much info..... If a player changes his planet name then only the player should see this not the rest of the players...
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|

September 3rd, 2002, 04:01 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
Quote:
Also, a question. I've created components for ships that produce intel points and research points, but I've never tested them. Do these not work?
|
Suicide Junkie (and others) have tried to get the intel and research components to work, but no luck so far. It has been requested as a patch improvement, but MM has not yet done the hardcode changes needed.
__________________
Jimbob
The best way to have a good idea is to have lots of ideas.
-Linus Pauling
Take away paradox from the thinker and you have a professor.
-Søren Kierkegaard
|

September 3rd, 2002, 03:52 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 123
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
I'd like to see an infinite research tree. Something one can pour excess research points into for marginal improvements of resource production, weapon damage, supply storage, armor/shield use, ect. The levels of course get progressively more demanding of research points and only provide marginal improvements, but it'd be something for a research based race to go on late in the game. A single mineral producing facility that changes production based on tech might be more appropriate than a separate type of facility for each level.
Sattelite and mine limits: Satellites should be limited by a matter of maintenance, not some arbitrary number. Mines should be a bit more abstract in use to easily allow more than 100. Stars! uses mines in a percentage chance of hitting mines based on speed. Minefields also decay naturally. Thus, mining an area shouldn't be a guarantee of destruction of the enemy, nor should a single minesweeper be guarentee of safety of a fleet.
|

September 3rd, 2002, 05:51 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 89
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
Speaking only on the topic of research, I'd like the following:
- Make divide points not waste points when projects are near completion. Instead, pool extra points and redivided them. Same for the remainder in the case of uneven division. Hate having 10,000rp and dividing over three projects and getting 3,333rp in each. Unless I'm mistaken, doesn't the AI always use divide? This would help it out too.
- Set an option in Settings.txt or the game config screens that allows us to choose diminishing returns for research. In other words, the more rp you dump into a project, the less actual rps it gets. Just for example, using: RP * 0.95^(RP/10000) would yield a 5% loss for every 10000 rps in a single project (that is, 20000 rps would yield 5% less than 10000 rps).
- The ability to restrict a tech from someone with a racial tech. The existing value in the TechArea.txt file for specifying a racial tech could be used, just switch to flags instead of numbers. So instead of 1-5 for racial techs, use 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16. Then use 32, 64, 128, 256 and 512 for a racial tech restriction. So, if making a tech available to Organic is 2, restricting from those with Organic would be 64. Just add numbers together to get multiple restrictions/permissions (i.e., 992 would mean no one with a racial tech could access that technology).
- And if it isn't already possible (keep forgetting to check), make it so a racial techs can have a starting level, thereby granting said tech to only those allowed to access it in the first place.
That's my quick list for reseach improvements.
__________________
-Zan
|

September 4th, 2002, 01:21 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
Quote:
Originally posted by Zanthis:
Speaking only on the topic of research, I'd like the following:[list][*]Make divide points not waste points when projects are near completion. Instead, pool extra points and redivided them. Same for the remainder in the case of uneven division. Hate having 10,000rp and dividing over three projects and getting 3,333rp in each. Unless I'm mistaken, doesn't the AI always use divide? This would help it out too.
|
AI research like humans - it never divide point equally. Regardless of how many projects you programed it to keep in research queue. MM get this aspect right. 
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

September 4th, 2002, 02:11 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Ohio, US
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Things we\'d like to see in the next patch
The first things that come to mind for me are:
1. Sticky options to start the game (drives me nuts to have to reset my favorite settings every time I start a game!)
2. Ability to select exactly which techs and levels we want to start a game with (as it was in SE3.)
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|