|
|
|
 |

October 8th, 2002, 09:58 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Feature Wanted: Advanced Scorched Earth
The first site looks pretty good.
It has references, no glaring errors or psych tricks, and is not pushing a point of view.
Other positive indicators are that it is longwinded  and dosen't make "absolute Certainty" conclusions.
The site at the second link there dosen't look very believable at all.
Quote:
the solid core of our planet could never be smaller or lighter than a certain minimum, otherwise the core would not be able to remain in the center of the planet.
|
Smaller or lighter.
That preys on the common sense that tells you something bigger is heavier, and heavier things sink.
However, the important bit here is DENSITY. If the core were both smaller and lighter, it could still be the same density, and end up at the center.
Dunking ever smaller rocks and pebbles into water will not get you one that floats!
Quote:
Since the inner core could have only been larger and heavier in the past than it is today - it cannot be the result of any "crystallization". This simple conclusion has astonishing consequences.
|
Now they're just making things up, based very loosely on the above, and faulty argument.
Quote:
The main consequence of the above is that all heat generated inside Earth is of radionic origin.
|
This is suspect, too. It may be an exaggeration for imagery purposes, but that's still out of character.
Quote:
Life on Earth is possible only because of the efficient cooling of this reactor - a process that is controlled primarily by the atmosphere.
|
Seriously? I guess the 3000 kilometer blanket of rock/magma all around the core has no effect on it then.
However, by this point, the article should have worn down your will to resist, and you wouldn't notice it.
ETC...
.................
This has been a test of the Emergency Skeptic System...
had this been a real emergency, there would be people screaming in the streets, and maybe a stock market crash as well 
[ October 08, 2002, 21:11: Message edited by: Suicide Junkie ]
__________________
Things you want:
|

October 10th, 2002, 03:56 AM
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Feature Wanted: Advanced Scorched Earth
Interesting article.
For the idea, what do you think guys, is it worthly to suggest for next patch (unlikely) and for SEV?
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|

October 10th, 2002, 04:29 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Feature Wanted: Advanced Scorched Earth
it would have to go into 5, but its a good idea.
i think there should be two things, the ability to attack (with value damagers, like RAD bombs) or plague unpopulated planets. this also leaves Lasting effects for plagues, so you cant just recolonize after your people die.
second, the ability for evacuating populations to do these things, or leave behind booby traps.
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|

October 11th, 2002, 01:23 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Feature Wanted: Advanced Scorched Earth
Right now I would not mind using Abandon Planet, (thus loosing my population) and be able to leave behind a significant booby trap.
I like to play a race that will never allow theselves be slaves and I don't feel as a leader I should let them be massacred.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|