|
|
|
 |

November 20th, 2002, 02:59 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Montevideo Uruguay
Posts: 1,598
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI DEAD MATCH CONTEST!
The Angelican Regency defeated the EEEvil in 230 turns. Always I liked to see the goodness triumph over the wickedness!
Eeevil_vs_ARegency_G5.zip
|

November 20th, 2002, 04:55 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Montevideo Uruguay
Posts: 1,598
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI DEAD MATCH CONTEST!
Jraenar vs Klingons.
Klingons are ahead in the numbers, but both empires are lack of resources (Klingons radioactives, Jraenar minearls).
It's another easy game. Think because the Klingons has not Minesweepers and has not the resources to build them, can't invade the Jraenar's systems... and mehanwhile the Jraenar's fleets had the "no movement" syndrome (for example, their fleet at Baksha).
I'm going to sleep...
EDIT: Turn 500 and nothing have changed! The Klingon won by points.
Later will post the link.
[ November 20, 2002, 10:58: Message edited by: Master Belisarius ]
|

November 20th, 2002, 05:56 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chandler, AZ, USA
Posts: 921
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI DEAD MATCH CONTEST!
Hmmm... the Rage seem to be having problems in this. In my testing they seemed to do well. Has anyone been playing against the Rage outside of this test? If so, what are your impressions?
__________________
My SEIV Code: L++++ GdY $ Fr+++ C-- S* T? Sf Tcp A%% M+++ MpT RV Pw+ Fq Nd- RP+ G++ Au+ Mm++(--)
Ursoids of the Galaxy, unite!
|

November 20th, 2002, 01:02 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Montevideo Uruguay
Posts: 1,598
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI DEAD MATCH CONTEST!
Quote:
Originally posted by Alpha Kodiak:
Hmmm... the Rage seem to be having problems in this. In my testing they seemed to do well. Has anyone been playing against the Rage outside of this test? If so, what are your impressions?
|
Please let me know if you think that was not using the right files (for example, check the buildings in the planets, the kind of planets selected by the AI, the ship designes, etc.).
Yes, I have expected more form the Rage, but in the other hand, think the Toron is one of the candidates to win the contest, and the EA is a veru good race.
Anyway, don't know, could be the map?
|

November 20th, 2002, 01:48 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 464
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI DEAD MATCH CONTEST!
@Alpha Kodiak,
In my games (large galaxies, high difficulty, low bonus, 19 modpack races) I generally find the Rage to be between 6th to 10th place across the first 100 turns (I include them in all my games).
They are aggressive and have good ships but I'm not sure that they expand fast enough.
@Master Belisarius,
Just a note, all Klingon ships carry minesweeper elements. Are you suggesting though that the AI waits until it has a certain number of Minesweeper ships though before it will tackle a known minefield?
Regards
GE
PS: The EA quite often make it into the top 4 in my games (make quite a few friends on the diplomatic front usually).
[ November 20, 2002, 11:59: Message edited by: God Emperor ]
|

November 20th, 2002, 03:49 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Montevideo Uruguay
Posts: 1,598
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI DEAD MATCH CONTEST!
Quote:
Originally posted by God Emperor:
@Master Belisarius,
Just a note, all Klingon ships carry minesweeper elements. Are you suggesting though that the AI waits until it has a certain number of Minesweeper ships though before it will tackle a known minefield?
|
Yep, I saw the ships designes with minesweepers, but also with cloak devices, then:
1) Are you sure that the AI decloak the ATTACK ships, before go through a minefield? (I know that the AI does it with the MINESWEEPERS SHIPS, and doubt that would be smart enough to do it with ATTACK ships). But I can see another problem: if the attack ships find a minefield not reported yet, the minesweepers will be useless because can't sweep mines while are cloaked.
2) Into the settings.txt, the Klingons have:
Ships don't move through minefields := True
It mean that these large fleets with ATTACK ships with minesweepers DEVICES, never will try to go through a warp point if know that at the other side does exist mines... They will wait until a MINESWEEPER SHIP could clean the minefield before go there.
Some modders, have changed this settings to "False".
To my taste, I like this setting in "True", because if not, the AI like to send fleets to commit suicide, sending ships without minesweepers DEVICES or lack of it...
But if you put it "True", then, the MINESWEEPERS SHIPS are a MUST BE.
[ November 20, 2002, 13:57: Message edited by: Master Belisarius ]
|

November 20th, 2002, 05:33 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 140
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: AI DEAD MATCH CONTEST!
Quote:
Originally posted by Alpha Kodiak:
Has anyone been playing against the Rage outside of this test? If so, what are your impressions?
|
I often met them during my EEE test games (different quadrants, no up to medium bonus, high
diffculty, TDM-races).
If anyone survive the first onslaught of your Rage the fortunes of war change. I think the Rage "kill" themselves by fighting almost every race they meet. They are bleeding out literally....
Probably the price for making them so aggressive.
Is it possible that the Rage research mines relatively late? After the EEE had deployed their first minefields (they research mines very early), they can relax for several years, crippling the expansion of the Rage at least in their direction for this time.
The fleets of the Rage are deadly in early game, a lot of ships. But I never met many fleets. The EEE could glass lots of planets before running into one of them. When they met one, well, very bad luck and some new construction orders.
Later in the game lack of technology becomes an issue. Maybe it comes from this "bleeding out".
According to my experiences it is true when I say: the later I met the Rage the better. To be honest I used (and use) them to test my AIs in early game. If you survive the first and second year after making First Contact with the Primary Sequencer (in his usual mood) you know that your race is doing fine.
After two games against your new Version I would say these impressions are still valid.
I cannot say anything about the expansion issue GE mentioned. Don't work with rock/ice planet races.
Regards
R.
__________________
homo homini lupus est
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|