Suggestions for more informative messages

[Cainehill]

Stryke11 said:
I didn't mean to demean anyone's position above and beyond disagreeing with it and I certainly don't feel my opinion is any more relevant (even less so compared to some of the folks on here with thousands of posts) than anyone else's.

I don't recall your first post that you refered to, but as one of the entities with thousands of posts here, I'd like to point out that quantity isn't quality.

[Graeme Dice]

Chazar said:
Besides I think that suspense is also a reason why the message window opens first, so you do not see the map and hence do not know immediately which provinces were won and which ones were lost unless you click on the battle summaries or dissmiss the message window...

No, the reason the message window opens first is because that's standard behaviour for a message log. It contains the most important information needed to complete your next turn.

[Graeme Dice]

Talleyrand said:
Leif, given that this is the way they've decided to design the game for every iteration of Dominions, I think my position is probably more concrete than yours in regard to Illwinter's thinking.

I'm glad that you've got a direct mental link to their brains and can determine exactly how they want the game to be. Back in the real world, we'd like to see things that need to be fixed, get fixed.

I'm supporting a compromise between the two different groups: those who enjoy the suspense, and those wanting more information in a more timely manner.

The nature of a compromise is that it leaves everybody unhappy with the result. Now, we can either please the tiny minority of people that like to be confused by their games, or we can please the majority of people who would rather their game not hide information from them.

If clicking on a message and reading information is still too slow for you and Stryke then perhaps you need to be playing another game.

I'm going to suggest that you go back and re-read my suggestion for what information should be presented, and my suggestion that people who are worried about losing "suspense" should simply not click on the message, since they apparently don't want to know a battle's result before the battle has finished.

[Talleyrand]

Graeme Dice said:

I'm glad that you've got a direct mental link to their brains and can determine exactly how they want the game to be. Back in the real world, we'd like to see things that need to be fixed, get fixed.

Stating something needs to be fixed implies that it is broken. If Illwinter thought the current system were broken, don't you think they would have "fixed" it by now? I don't have a direct link to their brains but I do have a little bit of common sense. Perhaps you should try exercising yours before you post something else.

The nature of a compromise is that it leaves everybody unhappy with the result.

Here's some advice: Don't bother applying for a position as ambassador for your country because you have very little knowledge about how negotiations work.

[JaydedOne]

Yet another good thread with a good initial idea headed for Locksville.

Is there something in the water this month?

[Leif_-]

Talleyrand said:
Stating something needs to be fixed implies that it is broken. If Illwinter thought the current system were broken, don't you think they would have "fixed" it by now?

Not necessarily. Illwinter is a "garage operation" and they've always had a tendency to work more on what they find interesting than on what's broken (which seems a pretty sensible approach for this type of game, really.) So that they haven't "fixed" something can mean that they don't think it's a problem, that they don't think it's important, that they've prioritised other stuff, that the code they'd have to change is particularly ugly and double-plus-un-fun or that they've been distracted with shinier, more rewarding aspects of making the game.

Besides, this is really a UI issue, and Illwinter's attention to those have always been a little haphazard.

[Graeme Dice]

Talleyrand said:
Stating something needs to be fixed implies that it is broken. If Illwinter thought the current system were broken, don't you think they would have "fixed" it by now? I don't have a direct link to their brains but I do have a little bit of common sense.

Unless you are going to argue that Illwinter believes their game is perfect, then you have no idea whether they want the messages to behave in a certain way. However, even if they do want the messages to be uninformative, which is unlikely, it's the player's job to inform the developers of what changes are necessary.

Here's some advice: Don't bother applying for a position as ambassador for your country because you have very little knowledge about how negotiations work.

Could we avoid silly analogies about international politics? Illwinter can either keep the messages as uninformative as they currently are, or they can listen to the dozens of people who have asked over the past several years for improved information to be presented in the message summary. The first case is supported by a few people who feel that strategy games present too much information and would rather be playing a RPG. The second case has been asked for constantly since Dominions I was released.

[thejeff]

I don't think anyone doesn't want more information available.

There seems to be a consensus on more info in the battle summary screens. Is anybody actually upset that the main message page doesn't tell you who won the battle?

The debate is getting heated and the actual positions are inches apart.

[Cainehill]

Talleyrand said:
Oh, this is lovely. I've suddenly become the bad guy.

...

Graeme Dice, I'm all for more information too. Sometimes even when I watch a battle I don't know the specifics of who got killed, etc. Can't you read?

Let me guess - you're not studying diplomacy or pol science there, eh?