did you mean to reduce the average number

[Kuritza]

Velusion said:
As someone who enjoys the aspect of army/troop tactics I welcome the lower gem income.

Hope you enjoy fending off hordes of dual-blessed demons with your national armies. ))

[Velusion]

Kuritza said:

Hope you enjoy fending off hordes of dual-blessed demons with your national armies. ))

As opposed to how much I enjoy them now???

[NTJedi]

Nappa said:
of gems per site with the 3.1 patch?

It seems that most of the new magic sites produce one gem each. This has reduced the total number of gems per territory.

Has anyone else noticed this?

It's also less likely to find the very powerful magic sites such as "The Ultimate Gateway"(50% Conjuration discount)... which I feel is even more painful.

[Ygorl]

Rathar, plenty of the old common sites had gem incomes higher than one. From what people are saying, most of the new ones don't. So the gem income from common sites has apparently gone down, even though the total ratio of common sites in a given game might not be any different.

[Edi]

Actually, a lot of the new sites have gem income of 2 or more. I would go so far as to say most of them.