Aquarium - Started - FIGHT! - Page 3

JimMorrison · #1 September 2nd, 2008, 07:09 AM

Dear lord. This one is even worse than the Stasis problem..... All I can say is, I've been really ill the last few days, and not entirely myself. Blah.

<3

llamabeast · #2 September 2nd, 2008, 08:28 AM

Not a problem. I hope you're feeling better.

sum1lost · #3 September 9th, 2008, 01:13 PM

I would like to rollback, please. Eriu has gone AI and was able to jump a turn in a fashion that was highly unexpected.

JimMorrison · #4 September 9th, 2008, 08:45 PM

I'm having a hard time seeing where Eriu actually was capable of doing anything dastardly enough to warrant a rollback more than any of the mundane difficulties caused by the stale. Yes, they took a VP from you. I'm pretty sure it should be easy enough to recapture. Seems like someone asking for the rollback because they had barbarians or troglodytes spawn somewhere inconvenient.

Granted, I am sure you want to sew this game up ASAP - it does look like we'll be unable to stop you. But rolling back to avert the loss of that VP will actually only make things take longer, than moving ahead from where we are now.

sum1lost · #5 September 9th, 2008, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimMorrison

I'm having a hard time seeing where Eriu actually was capable of doing anything dastardly enough to warrant a rollback more than any of the mundane difficulties caused by the stale. Yes, they took a VP from you. I'm pretty sure it should be easy enough to recapture. Seems like someone asking for the rollback because they had barbarians or troglodytes spawn somewhere inconvenient.

Granted, I am sure you want to sew this game up ASAP - it does look like we'll be unable to stop you. But rolling back to avert the loss of that VP will actually only make things take longer, than moving ahead from where we are now.

There are some other things that did not work like they were meant to because of that, but I'd rather not share them. A rollback would actually save time, because this turn is identical to the last one- we have to redo all of the orders.

JimMorrison · #6 September 9th, 2008, 09:16 PM

Right, and if you read the Llamaserver email, you can't just upload the old one. You have to redo the moves either way. So it takes extra time, because we have to get the old turn back.

I had an army sit in a swamp and get riddled with disease, and I'm still against a rollback.

sum1lost · #7 September 9th, 2008, 09:33 PM

Ah. I did not know it couldn't simply be rehosted. Thank you for clarifying.

jimkehn · #8 September 22nd, 2008, 08:38 AM

Anyone else playing this besides C'tis and Mictlan?? I am about ready to declare Mictlan the winner. He has done a very good job of both expansion and research. If everyone else wants to continue for awhile and see if we can combine to take Mictlan down, then I am game for that, also.

JimMorrison · #9 September 22nd, 2008, 09:20 AM

C'tis just violated their NAP and attacked R'lyeh.

I think it's too late for unification though, Mictlan only needs 2 more VPs to win, and he has an immense war machine.

Not to mention his immense magic machine.

It's only a matter of a couple of turns and it'll be over either way - in Mictlan's favor.

jimkehn · #10 September 22nd, 2008, 10:43 AM

OOPS!...I didn't think we had a NAP. I guess I need to start writing this stuff down, having a touch of halfzeimer's and all.

Mictlan attacked me last turn, without warning. I thought Mictlan and I were going to be allied to the end, so I attacked R'lyeh instead.

Yeah....just a matter of a few turns and it's lights out for C'tis.

8^)