|
|
|
|
|
November 11th, 2008, 01:13 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,133
Thanks: 25
Thanked 59 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
Summon Ujigami, 1E1S 8 gems, conj 5
Summon Kenzoku, 1s1e 9 gems, conj 6
Contact Jigami, 1N 10 gems, conj 4
Contact Mori-no-kami, 3N 21 gems, conj 5
Contact Yama-nokami, 4e 28 gems, conj 7
Summon Gozu Mezu, 3d 7 gems, conj 6
so how is Jomon now? does this significantly change/improve/expand the nation? What kind of strats do these offer them?
Last edited by Omnirizon; November 11th, 2008 at 02:59 AM..
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Omnirizon For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 11th, 2008, 01:35 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
How much magic does the Yama-no-Kami lose when it leaves the mountains? Seems like a pretty cool summons, and a pretty cool mage, but if it loses a lot of power, I'm wondering how exciting it actually is.
|
November 11th, 2008, 01:46 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,445
Thanks: 85
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
These look fantastic--great job Kristoffer!
I have a general question though, since the Yami-no-kami losing it's power if it leaves the mountains, would concern my Nebulon mod: Is this an ability that we can currently mod in? I've read through the various "forestform, waterform" etc. tags, and I don't see a specifically "mountainform" tag. The closest seems to be "landform". Does a "mountainform" exist, that we can mod in, ourselves? Or is this something that the Devs are still reserving?
__________________
You've sailed off the edge of the map--here there be badgers!
|
November 11th, 2008, 01:58 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,066
Thanks: 109
Thanked 162 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Re: Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
Kenzoku/Ujigami look like a reasonable thug chassis to me (although replacement armour would be a priority). Jigami look like a good alternative to wineskins/cauldrons for supporting an army.
|
November 11th, 2008, 02:01 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
Well, since it can only be summoned in mountains, it could theoretically have a #plainshape used for mountain form, and every other type of province give it the second form.
What do the soul catcher weapons do? They sound kind of like the twin spear of reanimation. And I guess the kenzoku are more thematically immortal than mechanically, as I don't see an immortal tag in there. They look pretty nice though. Also, any idea on randoms for the new mages?
It seems as though jomon is becoming a major bless nation.
|
November 11th, 2008, 02:13 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
I don't believe these significantly alter the balance of jomon at all. A small alteration of samurai armor encumbrance would have made a much bigger dent.
Rdonj; I don't believe a sacred summonable that far up the research path makes a blss nation. Toooooo long to get to your thug chassis.
|
November 11th, 2008, 02:27 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,133
Thanks: 25
Thanked 59 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Re: Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
i agree with both rdonj and chrispederson....
these _could_ make Jomon a bless nation, _yet_ they are too far up the research tree.
These should all be no higher than level four, with the exception of the Yama-no-Kami who should be either level five or six; then _maybe_ these could constitute a workable strategy. Their path and gem costs are about right, but being national summons they should be a lot lower on the tree; especially if they are intended to add another dimension of play to Jomon.
P.S. the Soul Catcher does a "Soul Trap" on hit. What that means is beyond me, it could be anything from instant death to enslave. sounds interesting at any rate.
|
November 11th, 2008, 02:39 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
Ox-Head and Horse-Face's weapons cause an effect that looks like False Fetters. It seems to be some kind of entrapment.
|
November 11th, 2008, 02:47 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,007
Thanks: 171
Thanked 206 Times in 159 Posts
|
|
Re: Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
Contact Jigami, 1n 10 gems, conj 4.
Summon Ujigami, 1e1s 8 gems, conj 5.
Contact Mori-no-kami, 3N 21 gems, conj 5.
Summon Kenzoku, 1s1e 9 gems, conj 6.
Summon Gozu Mezu, 3d 7 gems, conj 6.
Contact Yama-nokami, 4e 28 gems, conj 7.
"Ox-Head and Horse-Face's weapons cause an effect that looks like False Fetters. It seems to be some kind of entrapment."
Hmm, that's not bad. Depending on how good it is that could be pretty nasty with their stats.
Jomon has a lot of other summons that are sacred also though (tengu, oni general/dai oni), and though their recruitable sacreds aren't the best and are capitol only they're fairly reasonably priced at least compared to the rest of jomon's recruitables.
Last edited by rdonj; November 11th, 2008 at 02:53 AM..
|
The Following User Says Thank You to rdonj For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 11th, 2008, 03:02 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,133
Thanks: 25
Thanked 59 Times in 36 Posts
|
|
Re: Jomon's new summons (how is Jomon now?)
1. lower the level of these new summons
2. possibly give the Kenzoku actual immortality (but then keep him the same level)
3. half the cost of the Dai Tengu summon
then Jomon would start looking like a competitive nation that would use a summon and bless strategy
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|