|
|
|
 |
|

February 28th, 2012, 09:10 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 449
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Ulm staled the past two turns, missing all of the critical initial clashes of the war. Not a very good sign. Is the game done?
|

February 29th, 2012, 01:24 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I have no idea why llamaserve is behaving like that....
|

February 29th, 2012, 07:23 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 449
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Are you saying that you sent in turns, but the server ignored them? Did you get the "turn received" emails? If so, that's a pretty serious problem. The game's status page never showed you as having submitted a turn.
|

February 29th, 2012, 01:26 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
No, I delayed the game but it did not delay.
|

February 29th, 2012, 02:35 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 449
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
How would you like to handle it? Should we discuss a rollback?
|

February 29th, 2012, 02:46 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
That would be usefull, I did not look at the actual new turn yet.
The last turn I should have gotten in was the one in which everyone largely retreated from my territory.
|

February 29th, 2012, 04:40 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 449
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I'm not quite sure if you are asking for a 1-turn or 2-turn rollback.
I could probably support a 1-turn rollback - but not 2 turns. Not only would that be playing with fire (I'm guessing there would be a pretty significant risk that the whole game would explode in some way), but I put an awful lot of time into preparing those turns, and I really do not want to have to recreate it all. If we just roll back to make it turn 55 again, I can just resubmit my existing .2h file.
|

March 1st, 2012, 08:22 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
1 turn, 2 turn is playing with total and utter fire.
|

March 1st, 2012, 10:06 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 449
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I am OK with a 1-turn rollback. I think every remaining major power ought to be able to veto the rollback, so you should pm Gurthang to make sure he sees this.
|

March 1st, 2012, 10:52 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 106
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I just read the discussion. I dislike rollbacks but I won't object to one, even if there was an important battle (where I was duly trashed) in 77 this turn, and even if I just sent turn 56. Shortly, I will accept your decisions.
However, I will be abroad this weekend. Whatever your decision I will try to do my turn tomorrow afternoon, but in case I am unable to, next hosting should be set at Monday evening.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|