|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

November 4th, 2015, 02:50 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,061
Thanks: 384
Thanked 455 Times in 327 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
Yep Firefox / Google flagged site again  I cannot agree more about NoScript and Adblock Plus - wouldn't dream of surfing without em! and is it just me or can you not include carrige return/enter anymore? ie I typed this on a seperate line / para.
|

November 4th, 2015, 04:41 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,869
Thanks: 812
Thanked 1,368 Times in 1,024 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
Here WE go again, Firefox/Google together aren't making for a happy marriage as it's saying we're unsafe again. Accessed using my saved bookmarks. I'm using the top rated anti virus program two years running now and it hasn't made a peep about this when it first came up ~3 months ago or just now. This includes my freeware Malwarebytes and MS 10 Defender software. No fear here just an exercise in futility it seems.
Regards,
Pat
__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
|

November 4th, 2015, 12:21 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,998
Thanks: 492
Thanked 1,931 Times in 1,257 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
Noscript threw up a script that was not there before today:
suchka46.pw
Which looks distinctly dodgy, so I blocked that one. A Goggle search did not show much on that - though one phishing site did seem to mention it, but it was in Polish, I think.
|

November 5th, 2015, 12:53 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,869
Thanks: 812
Thanked 1,368 Times in 1,024 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
No log in issues with MS EDGE. FIREFOX/GOOGLE still showing issue. No hits with my antivirus programs, though I haven't run the MS Malicious software scan for this month. I'll leave this now to people smarter then me.
Regards,
Pat
__________________
"If something is not impossible, there must be a way of doing it." - Sir Nicholas Winton
"Ex communi periculo, fraternitas" - My career long mentor and current friend -QMCM/SS M. Moher USN Ret..
|

November 5th, 2015, 08:13 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,688
Thanks: 4,120
Thanked 5,919 Times in 2,913 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
Shrapnel is aware and looking into it
Don
|

November 5th, 2015, 08:30 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Wilmington, NC, USA
Posts: 1,085
Thanks: 28
Thanked 264 Times in 85 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
We have reviewed everything and this appears to be a fake attack. We are working with google to remove the ban.
__________________
Tim Brooks
Shrapnel Games
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tim Brooks For This Useful Post:
|
|

November 5th, 2015, 11:28 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
Google needs to sort this, human nature someone will pick up on it & decide to attack it just because it came to their attention via google
__________________
John
|

November 8th, 2015, 02:17 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 1,061
Thanks: 384
Thanked 455 Times in 327 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
Getting warnings of trojans by kaspersky...
|

November 11th, 2015, 03:01 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,015
Thanks: 143
Thanked 382 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
My anti-virus says detects a threat from the shrapnel forums called JS/Iframe.MG trojan...
|

November 12th, 2015, 03:09 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,688
Thanks: 4,120
Thanked 5,919 Times in 2,913 Posts
|
|
Re: Bad site?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wulfir
My anti-virus says detects a threat from the shrapnel forums called JS/Iframe.MG trojan...
|
Ulf, send me an email with the info that scanner is picking up if you can please. Shrapnel wants to take a look at it.
We *suspect* that there is some crossover in how some trojans are detected and that's why some are screaming about the same thing and others don't. As I said in another post and it's based on what I've been told and I have no doubt it's acccurate.......when Shrapnel reviews the info provided by the site that Google recommends be used to "clean up" .........the report comes back clean. Yet we have repeated reports of problems and yesterday McAfee reported the forums to me as a bad site but not today.
Don
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|