|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

July 13th, 2020, 04:49 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saline, Michigan, USA
Posts: 252
Thanks: 208
Thanked 60 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Artillery Plotting Without Actually Firing Guns
Sounds like a tactic I could use. Going to keep it in mind, could come in handy. It would be quicker and less tedious than shifting, though you would have to remember turning them back on.
|

July 13th, 2020, 06:25 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: Artillery Plotting Without Actually Firing Guns
Once-upon-a-time I trained as a Forward Observer (long before counter battery radars were a common thing, and before MLRS etc.) Timing your mortar/artillery strike is something we learned. WinSPMBT doesn't really support that outside scenario creation, and even then it's limited. Keep in mind each turn in WinSPMBT is minutes not seconds long, so when you fool with adjusting your strikes around to get them to land when you want it's still a window of a couple minutes not a few seconds.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Suhiir For This Useful Post:
|
|

July 14th, 2020, 01:22 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kingsland, GA.
Posts: 2,873
Thanks: 814
Thanked 1,371 Times in 1,027 Posts
|
|
Re: Artillery Plotting Without Actually Firing Guns
Excellent point!! It's sometimes in the " heat of battle" to forget the " game clock" (I can't remember, but, I think it is 3 min for each player (2) for a 6 minute full turn cycle(?).) thus finding yourself asking why am I waiting whatever turns for your fire mission when you're being" pressed" on the battlefield.
It's just one of those things that makes it interesting out here. It'll force to think about possible enemy lines of advance and plotting some of your fire missions along that line of advance.
Regards,
Pat

__________________
"Commanders should be counseled chiefly by persons of known talent, by those who have made the art of war their particular study, and by those who are present at the scene of the action, who see the enemy, who see the advantages that occasions offer, and who, like people embarked in the same ship, are sharers of the danger." - Roman General Lucius Paulus
|

July 30th, 2020, 01:23 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 73
Thanks: 171
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Artillery Plotting Without Actually Firing Guns
Sometimes I just use one tube out of 3 or 4 for the initial barrage and after correcting for fall of shot I cork them all. When my prey comes along I then uncork all the tubes and they get the whole enchilada. This I think gives a more accurate initial barrage. Am I seeing this correctly?
__________________
George
|

July 30th, 2020, 02:00 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,692
Thanks: 4,126
Thanked 5,923 Times in 2,915 Posts
|
|
Re: Artillery Plotting Without Actually Firing Guns
If your FOO has eyes on the target then certainly using one tube as a kind of spotter round if you are conserving rounds is perfectly acceptable and then when you have the enemy units in your field of fire you can use all tube as a "fire for effect" mission
Quote:
Fire for effect is a military term. According to NATO doctrine: Fire which is delivered after the mean point of impact or burst is within the desired distance of the target or adjusting/ranging point. Term in a call for fire to indicate the adjustment/ranging is satisfactory and fire for effect is desired.
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|