|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

March 2nd, 2023, 07:03 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 792
Thanks: 1,287
Thanked 578 Times in 314 Posts
|
|
Re: Thermal Imaging and Smoke Dischargers
Quote:
Originally Posted by lansoar
Looking at it from another angle, can any Tank vets comment on TTS in different situations? The game basically portrays two. You can see thru smoke, you can't see thru smoke. Were there degrees of "seeing" (and thus targeting) for TTS in different settings and/or ranges?
Examples would be, thick smoke popped in near proximity to the AFV vs. distant. Is there any cumulative effect when distance and # of "hexes" filled with smoke between the targeted and the unit are considered?
Not referencing special smoke that might be designed to degrade vision devices. Just generic smoke.
|
I think your misunderstanding a few things, TI or thermal imaging allows you (a gunner or TC in this case) to see through smoke, even chemical smoke, since it registers heat images in the sight. So we'd look for heat signatures from engines or bodies, they light up in the sight and you fire at that, smoke does not block it if using thermals.
__________________
ASL
|

March 6th, 2023, 12:55 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 64
Thanks: 20
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Thermal Imaging and Smoke Dischargers
absolutely.
but whether Offensive or Defensive. Having units that can sit on ridges and X-ray smoke is a game changer of the highest order.
It makes for interesting wargaming. One of the aspects of SPMBT is the broad range of technology coverage due to the length of time. I recently played back to back two scenarios.....one in which the primary NATO defender was the US with 105mm equipped M1s vs. Soviet "A-Team" T-80 bn's. Second was a slightly later similar scenario only with 120mm M1's vs the same T-80s.
yikes.
On the issue of smoke.....regardless of how the Soviet side used it. TTS made it a non factor. I get that depending on era, INF and RECON units might not have the same benefit......but thats why I just wanted to start a discussion on the tech and what it can really do, outside the game.
a fascinating subject on a literal game changing tech.
|

March 2nd, 2023, 10:28 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,988
Thanks: 480
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,250 Posts
|
|
Re: Thermal Imaging and Smoke Dischargers
And fire hexes can be seen through as well, but unlike SP2/3 thermal vision is not unlimited through fire hexes, there is now a cumulative degradation and so enough fire hexes will eventually stop the LOS of thermals.
And larger fires will contribute more blocking factor, any smaller fire hexes less. So having fires dotted about the place, whether burning trees, wrecks and buildings or say a Buratino salvo of flame rockets going off, will tend to produce some thermal "shadow zones" when trying to spot through it with TI.
I cannot recall when we added that, It may have been back in the MS-DOS days, but its there now.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|

March 4th, 2023, 12:34 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 64
Thanks: 20
Thanked 18 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Thermal Imaging and Smoke Dischargers
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack
And fire hexes can be seen through as well, but unlike SP2/3 thermal vision is not unlimited through fire hexes, there is now a cumulative degradation and so enough fire hexes will eventually stop the LOS of thermals.
And larger fires will contribute more blocking factor, any smaller fire hexes less. So having fires dotted about the place, whether burning trees, wrecks and buildings or say a Buratino salvo of flame rockets going off, will tend to produce some thermal "shadow zones" when trying to spot through it with TI.
I cannot recall when we added that, It may have been back in the MS-DOS days, but its there now.
|
Thanks. This is interesting.
|

March 2nd, 2023, 03:45 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: Thermal Imaging and Smoke Dischargers
Also since the use of thermal sights has become fairly common many nations have developed (or are developing) new ammo for smoke discharges, similar to the way flares are used by aircraft to defeat heat-seaking missiles.
"High Performance Smoke/Obscurant Munitions
Red Phosphorus
Two types of expendable smoke/obscurant munitions that are widely available are those based on red phosphorus (RP), and brass flake. The use of zinc/hexachloroethane (HC, or HCE) based smokes was discontinued in Australia more than five years ago as a result of their potential to cause acute and chronic injury to Army personnel. White phosphorus (WP) munitions can also be used to produce copious smoke, however unlike RP, WP is highly toxic as a solid, and it spontaneously combusts in air. RP smoke compositions are by comparison pyrotechnics as the RP is mixed with oxidants and binders and therefore the burning rate can be varied."
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Suhiir For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|