|
|
|
|
|
November 6th, 2007, 10:25 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 495
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Markata are the most powerful unit in the entire game. The entire game!
My sc with the stone sword will kill himself after swinging it 50 times. The most effective way in the game of killing him is 51 markatas, at 255 gold. Plz Nerf Markatas.
__________________
Unus vocis. Unus manus. Unus Universitas. Unus Deus. Is est meus fatum praeeo pro totus populus.
Ut est meus fortuna.
|
November 6th, 2007, 10:36 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Since somehow it looked like my kind played a small part in causing this, I should point out that my case of the monkey nations (Aside from Lanka) being weak is that their troops are poor precision low protection chaff for the most part and as a result difficult to early expand with on a consistent one province a turn basis. Elephants make up but Bandar chaff isn't as good as say wingless. The VQ was actually suggested because I didn't want to pick the Ghost King since when I wrote the guide, the GK was by far the best SC chassis but I thought VQ would be fun since Patala can get away with taking neg scales since their nationals aren't too great. I don't know how Kailasa/Bandar Log plays out because Lanka blows Kailasa out of the waters and Bandar Log has some problems on magic diversity. The monkey nations have poor PD but really I think their main problem is, their infantry (aside from broken Elephants) are just overpriced for what they do. The longbows cost 20 gold for larger easier to hit targets with lower precision. Against elemental battlemagics, monkey troops just disappears. To say nothing about good archer platoons early on. Once you get to late game though, they're awesome especially EA/LA with clammable mages off the bat and the astral to use it but it's getting there that's pretty tough.
I think Lordbob has some valid points about how PD can play a role in the success of a nation. PD that's hard to raid is very very annoying to deal with but that's not the main flaw of monkeys.
|
November 6th, 2007, 10:43 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 495
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Well put.
__________________
Unus vocis. Unus manus. Unus Universitas. Unus Deus. Is est meus fatum praeeo pro totus populus.
Ut est meus fortuna.
|
November 6th, 2007, 11:08 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
I went back and counted the little monkeys. I then built a slightly better raiding force.
For 20 PD, Patala has:
40 Melee Markata
20 Bow Markata
10 Melee Atavi
10 Bow Atavi
1 Atavi Commander
1 Bandar Commander
this can be beaten by:
1 Independent Commander
6 Heavy Human Independent Infantry
8 Archers(any type) behind the heavy infantry
That's it. 170 Gold
|
November 6th, 2007, 11:12 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: R'lyeh
Posts: 3,861
Thanks: 144
Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Quote:
quantum_mechani said:
It's no mean feat getting people more worked up over markaka than helhirdlings.
|
I thought this sounded an awful lot like all these Helheim threads from the start. They even proposed to do a test game, one against one, to undermine and proof their theories, see.
|
November 6th, 2007, 11:14 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 214
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Ulm would like to introduce your Elephants to his little friend, Mr. Flail. Really, Bandar Log troops are poor, Ulm troops are strong, and elephants don't make up the difference.
One on one, there won't be a mid-game for MA Ulm to lose miserably.
|
November 6th, 2007, 11:21 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 411
Thanks: 69
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Please, just play out this game already. I'm tired of hearing about the imaginary war, I want to hear the results of the real war. Or, you know, the real imaginary war.
|
November 6th, 2007, 11:57 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 674
Thanks: 7
Thanked 15 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Death bless will molest ulmish troops and pretender, end of story. Afflictions up the wazzoo, with mr based an attack.
|
November 7th, 2007, 05:46 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sweden, Ume�
Posts: 991
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Whatever pretender you build there is a counter (not to mention your pretender cannot be everywhere). Also the bandar log player is allowed a pretender of his own you know.
Edit: I feel we have argued this as far as it will go, if you want to test the ulm v bandar log deal feel free to send me a pm.
|
November 7th, 2007, 07:14 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
Want to play Top Trumps? Before we start, I should point out I've memorised the deck, so you lose. See you around.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|