|
|
|
|
|
December 1st, 2008, 03:33 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florence, Italy
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 740
Thanked 112 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
Hey, I said it, look better post 89
|
December 1st, 2008, 03:39 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 913
Thanks: 21
Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
I figured Caelum lost that war, because he was the first to go AI and you wouldn't
|
December 1st, 2008, 11:00 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 990
Thanks: 13
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
Could you please just kill me off already?
PRETTY PLEASE!!!!
I'd go AI, but I know the AI would just wander out and try to break the siege thus rendering all advantage moot...
Certainly you must have enough in your 200+ hoard to whittle through my pathetic undead screen...
|
December 1st, 2008, 11:49 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 913
Thanks: 21
Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
Possibly, but I'd still lose quite a lot of quality troops to the freezing mists (which are not 1AN damage - the spell description and the manual lie).
I was actually waiting for you to get bored and try to break the siege or turn yourself AI.
|
December 1st, 2008, 03:27 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 990
Thanks: 13
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
1AN open ended...
So yeah, it can be a kick in the nuts
|
December 7th, 2008, 02:12 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: United States
Posts: 919
Thanks: 26
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
OK looks like I'm pretty much history.
Just to let you all know whats up,it seems that Oceania has driven Argatha from thier cave system. So Argatha takes over my Capitol province ,much like Oceania has taken thiers.
Argatha has an army of about 180 in my ,err ,thier fortress.
Good game for awhile, now it's just waiting to be over.
|
December 9th, 2008, 10:58 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 913
Thanks: 21
Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
Did anyone else see the storming of Ulmish capitol? The wyrm conveniently took a position at the gate and could have defeated the entire attacking army by himself if he hadn't run away.
It seems that the map's description of which nations have it harder is accurate - all of the hard and very hard nations are practically defeated.
|
December 9th, 2008, 11:27 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florence, Italy
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 740
Thanked 112 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
That's why I tried to make some alliance among the hard/very hard nations to beat the ones having easy time. Ermor and Marverni agreed and we had some peaceful expansion. But Caelum went crazy about a province and everything was messed up for me Still a gg it was
|
December 9th, 2008, 11:28 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 913
Thanks: 21
Thanked 53 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
That's certainly the way hard nations should have played this game.
|
December 9th, 2008, 11:31 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florence, Italy
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 740
Thanked 112 Times in 63 Posts
|
|
Re: Greenrow: noobs, slowpace -- game on
I think so. Even because they happen not to be compensated by the superior early game strenght of the nation itself - except maybe for Caelum...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|