RTH has filled all slots; discuss the game here! - Page 10

Ragnarok · #91 February 18th, 2004, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tesco samoa:
Last man standing please... no alliances of 2 at the end.

And I request we turn off the events As they can ruin a game

Alright, no alliances at all. The more I think about it the more I would like it this way, that will assure this will be an even greater game!

I will change the game description.

Events will be turned off unless we get more individuals choosing to keep it on; if it is kept in the game it will be set on low and with the severity and low as well.

Cirvol - The Religious trait will still be helpful in the game with all of the Shrines you get from it. The Nature Shrine is the best of the 5 but they are all good, IMO. Not having the Talisman will not criple the trait.

I thought about modding it out or to tone it down but I would like to keep this game as stock as possible.

Tesco - Are you still willing to make the map for us? If so we will need 10 clusters of around 10 systems each and a total amount of planets in each cluster around 150 or so. Let me know if I should find someone else to make the map.

Spoo · #92 February 18th, 2004, 08:31 PM

I agree with Tesco, no events.

This is going to be good.

tesco samoa · #93 February 18th, 2004, 09:18 PM

I can create one with the new koth map mod i am working on.

Do we want an all planet map ??? That way each player will get around the same planets within each cluster ?

This should be talked about.

I can post a few examples for the players to look at and see if they like it or not.

This will also help with the dicussion. So tonight or tomorrow I will post 10 maps. And we can all vote on them using weight options. Then we can tally the numbers up and that can be the map. If you think that is a good idea.

Spoo · #94 February 18th, 2004, 11:41 PM

Sounds good to me. I think something beyond just all planets would be fun. Say one trinary star system per cluster (mmm triple-sphereworld system

) Asteroids would be good in moderation. Gives a use for planet-creators (especialy if if the asteroids have higher resource values than an average planet).

Electrum · #95 February 19th, 2004, 12:00 AM

By no alliances, do you mean at the end of the game, or through he whole game?

Cirvol · #96 February 19th, 2004, 04:56 PM

oh yeah, one more thing - no quitting or surrendering or anything that will 'unbalance' the game for the rest of the players

i think you're all pretty hard core, which is good

just make sure no one does anything stupid like get pissed off due an early war and quit - it kinda wrecks it for the rest of us

kthx

tesco samoa · #97 February 19th, 2004, 07:16 PM

good thing about people who qiut like that is they are not invited back and their name is passed around to a few other pbw hosts

Ragnarok · #98 February 20th, 2004, 02:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Electrum:
By no alliances, do you mean at the end of the game, or through he whole game?

Just by the end of the game. You can have alliances through the game but when it comes down to deciding who wins the game it will be only 1 player so alliances will fall.

Tesco - I like the idea for choosing the maps. I look forward to seeing what you come up with.

Ragnarok · #99 February 25th, 2004, 09:14 PM

*bump*

Is there anything else that we need to discuss before we start?

tesco samoa · #**100** February 25th, 2004, 09:51 PM

I should have the maps done by friday.... For a look over and vote.... If not it will be sunday.