|
|
|
 |
|

August 24th, 2009, 05:25 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire vs. Death heavy bless
He's not going to take credit for turning you into a newt. But it is the reason he doesn't correct people's grammar in public any more.
|

August 24th, 2009, 07:01 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 792
Thanks: 28
Thanked 45 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire vs. Death heavy bless
As far as I can see it, both the pro- and anti- D9 bless arguments are hedged under a vast stream of "ifs". IF you've been able to collect a huge stock of blood slaves. IF you don't get jumped by 3-4 adversaries. IF you cast utterdark and no-one removes it, IF you can expand freely because geography has been kind. IF no-one has been able to turtle. IF it's a large/medium/small map, IF etc.
All this really tells us is that lots of strategies are viable. The games everyone is talking about have had particular circumstances in game setup, what the other players have done and will also have depended how good they were.
|

August 24th, 2009, 03:39 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire vs. Death heavy bless
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agema
As far as I can see it, both the pro- and anti- D9 bless arguments are hedged under a vast stream of "ifs". IF you've been able to collect a huge stock of blood slaves. IF you don't get jumped by 3-4 adversaries. IF you cast utterdark and no-one removes it, IF you can expand freely because geography has been kind. IF no-one has been able to turtle. IF it's a large/medium/small map, IF etc.
All this really tells us is that lots of strategies are viable. The games everyone is talking about have had particular circumstances in game setup, what the other players have done and will also have depended how good they were.
|
Well, and it also tells you the circumstances under which those strategies are viable. Frex, Baalz' point about blood nations bootstrapping into death via vampire lords is well-taken IMHO.
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|

August 24th, 2009, 07:15 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire vs. Death heavy bless
Sure but I think there's agreement amonst the majority of the veteran players that F9 as a bless is considerably better in the round than D9. That's taking into account the fact a D9 caster is more valuable than an F9 caster.
|

August 24th, 2009, 08:10 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 792
Thanks: 28
Thanked 45 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire vs. Death heavy bless
I agree.
The advantage of a D9 bless seems to be almost nothing to do with having the bless, but being able to access a D9 mage. (This immediately makes you wonder why you don't take, say, D6-8, and get the rest of the way with boosters.) The turn 40 Utterdark strategy seems to me to be a massive gamble, putting all your eggs in one basket. It might win spectacularly, but it's far more likely something will go wrong, and the egg will be on your face.
|

August 24th, 2009, 11:40 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Fire vs. Death heavy bless
I also can't see how making yourself an instant enemy of every player in the game, not from the position of most powerful nation (extrapolated from the lack of awake SC or powerful expansive bless), while simultaneously spending all your hard won death gems to do so is a good idea. I guess it might work great if all the others players failed to counter or coordinate. Nice idea though.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|