|
|
|
|
|
March 14th, 2009, 02:43 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
Well, I have to admit, I wouldn't mind throwing in the towel in this game. Gath is doing fine but the dynamics of the game seem to make it kind of pointless. I have no way to get into the ocean and don't see anyone else who can, and the only way to expand at this point is to attack land neighbors, which just makes it easier for R'lyeh like what happened with Ermor. I just see R'lyeh winning this game no matter what happens - This is first MP game I've been in with LA R'lyeh and I think its too unbalanced especially without having any nations with decent recruitable underwater units in the game and with this map. And I think Incabulos has done a great job strategically / diplomatically getting on land and taking out weakened nations.
|
March 14th, 2009, 02:52 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonCorazon
Well, I have to admit, I wouldn't mind throwing in the towel in this game. Gath is doing fine but the dynamics of the game seem to make it kind of pointless. I have no way to get into the ocean and don't see anyone else who can, and the only way to expand at this point is to attack land neighbors, which just makes it easier for R'lyeh like what happened with Ermor. I just see R'lyeh winning this game no matter what happens - This is first MP game I've been in with LA R'lyeh and I think its too unbalanced especially without having any nations with decent recruitable underwater units in the game and with this map. And I think Incabulos has done a great job strategically / diplomatically getting on land and taking out weakened nations.
|
I'm happy to give up myself D:
I don't think R'yleh is too terribly unbalanced, this map was just a horrible decision. Ry'leh had access to attack any and every land nation instead of having to chew inwards from a single coast. I thought that would be a disadvantage, but it turned out otherwise. There were also simply too many water provinces.
Jazzepi
|
March 14th, 2009, 03:04 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
Exactly, they border every nation and can pick who to attack at any time. And with graphs off, they have the best intel. And with no other nations in the game with recruitable underwater troops - Mictlan, Atlantis, Patala - nobody can take the fight to them. Basically they can just pick land nations off as they see fit.
|
March 14th, 2009, 06:49 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
I am also willing to cede victory to rlyeh.
I had a bad start due to missfortune, and after that ermor decided that they will use their last breath to raid me . It seems that rlyeh considers me so weak that they rather attack man first as they know they can take me whenever they like.
|
March 14th, 2009, 07:57 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 539
Thanks: 15
Thanked 43 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
I wouldn't mind seeing some last turns posted if we are to stop here,
I'm started towards news of the greater world as I at most controlled four provinces.
|
March 14th, 2009, 10:56 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 239
Thanks: 29
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
Yeah the extended coast was a strength not a weakness.
I spent the first part of the game just recruiting the tentacled priests and building temples so I could push my dominion.
I will post info/ a turn file once I know the game is conceeded.
I certainly would have had a much harder time in a map with more ocean but less coast. At least my opportunity to attack would have been more limited making my chaff much less useful, and attacks like the one I just launched against man impossible.
|
March 14th, 2009, 12:03 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
I think its conceded unless anyone objects. I had the sense Gath was probably in the best condition to stop you (we had Arcos and Ctis capitals) but with no land border and no W mages and crappy gem income in spite of searching everywhere (I think I counted 19 Gnome Lores and +3 E income ) we give up!
|
March 14th, 2009, 09:18 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 159
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
I'm for conceding.
|
March 15th, 2009, 04:18 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bordeaux, France
Posts: 92
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
No objection to declaring R'lyeh winner.
|
March 15th, 2009, 07:14 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 239
Thanks: 29
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Laurus : Game On!
Thanks
Here is my trn file. I was 1 turn away from dreams of r'lyeh and was then heading for the spell that affects coastal provinces. To bee honest for the longest time I wasn't sure who I had NAPS with since I think a couple came through in game messages which really confuse me since I have no record of them :/.
One of my biggest issues was actually forsaking research for so many turns so I could really push my dominion with the little purple priests and build temples almost everywhere.
I had terrible luck in the void gate.. (maybe I mentioned that in the previous post?)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|