Perpetuality - 62 Player MegaGame (Finished!)

[vfb]

Jazzepi said:
Midgard's light in this world is fading. We will not go without a fight, but no one nation can fight against four lined against them. We will return our items to those who donated them to us, and provide as best we can to those who offered to help.

We also curse MA Eriu for staling the last three turns. As well as the four cowardly nations of LA C'Tis, MA Man, EA C'Tis, and EA Maverni.

Jazzepi

Oh, chin up, you whiny wolves! You had Marveni down to zero provinces. Did you see us moaning on in public? Well, okay, we admit that there was a little bit of sobbing and weeping, but we swear that was our womenfolk! They've got beards too, you know. Besides, look on the bright side, you've still got your lovely scales!

About the "cowardly" thing: our Menhir has been flying at your 200-strong armies on his oddy knocky, and you are the ones who are always doing the running away, fertilizing the fields in the process. Our bard has even plagiarized a song about it:

Brave Midgard did run away.
Bravely ran away, away!
When danger reared its ugly head,
They bravely turned their tails and fled.
Yes, brave Midgard did turn about
And gallantly they chickened out.
Bravely taking to their feet
They beat a very brave retreat,
Bravest of the brave, Midgard!

They're packing it in and packing it up
And sneaking away and buggering up
And chickening out and pissing off home ...

[Jazzepi]

For all this doom and gloom, Midgard is still not out of the running.

The nation of Midgard shall rise again XD

Jazzepi

[DrPraetorious]

You *could* have ignored C'tis' calls for war, or fought a defensive engagement only in the unlikely event that he invaded you himself.

Instead, you proceeded to invade him - so I attacked you, duh, as indeed I said I would if I thought you were doing too well in that war.

What did you expect?

[Evilhomer]

Seems I will have access to dominions for another 6-7 turns, after that folket will take over as previously mentioned.

[Jazzepi]

DrPraetorious said:
You *could* have ignored C'tis' calls for war, or fought a defensive engagement only in the unlikely event that he invaded you himself.

Instead, you proceeded to invade him - so I attacked you, duh, as indeed I said I would if I thought you were doing too well in that war.

What did you expect?

The mighty nation of Midgard will hear no more of MA Man's silly arguments, laced with non-truths and retardisms (a word freshly coined by Midgard's scribes to describe the empty headed notions of MA Man). What pungent, ineffective, backwards logic they have. That the land of Midgard should sit idly by while their neighbors declare all out war on them, calling for all nations to attack, and *hope* that their borders are not invaded. That defending one's self by bringing the battle to the enemy is a sign of weakness or poor strategy. This comes from the same MA Man that complained so whole heartedly about how Midgard would not meet them in battle. Apparently the idea of "tactics" and "strategy" is lost on the vultures of MA Man. And who lambasted their own ally for raiding Midgard's lands. A strategy which has proved quite effective.

Man should only be so lucky that they have a lackey in the form of EA C'Tis who will endure such abuse from a nation whom must be filled with commanders with no grasp on strategy.

And, to top it all off, Man actively pretends to have "warned" the mighty nation of Midgard that it would attack. As if Midgard defending itself agaisnt EA C'Tis has somehow brought the attack of C'Tis and Man down upon it.

The reality is that MA Man only offered vague excuses about an alliance with LA C'Tis when an NAP was asked about, while EA C'Tis gathered forces on our border. No where in that accord was "we'll attack you if you do too well against EA C'Tis" mentioned, but the people of Midgard are sure that Man would love to have the moral high ground. Anything, really, to make the notion of four nations against one seem more palatable.

Jazzepi

[Amhazair]

Damn, man... is it normal that there are so few water sites underwater (I currently have an 8/turn income, and 4 of that is from my capitol), or am I just terribly unlucky? On the other side of the spectrum, I find (way) more kelp castles than I know what to do with.

(This is the first time ever I play a water nation, so I'm not yet familiar with the normal site distribution patterns underseas)

[Evilhomer]

I have actually been somewhat lucky with water sites this game compared to you. As to your question I would say that finding a good income of earth and nature is pretty common underwater - They are almost more frequent than water sites.

[Velusion]

I'm switching MA Caelum and Eriu to AI if I don't hear from them by the end of the day.

[Salamander8]

Amhazair said:
Damn, man... is it normal that there are so few water sites underwater (I currently have an 8/turn income, and 4 of that is from my capitol), or am I just terribly unlucky? On the other side of the spectrum, I find (way) more kelp castles than I know what to do with.

(This is the first time ever I play a water nation, so I'm not yet familiar with the normal site distribution patterns underseas)

I'm having bad luck with this as well. I usually find quite a few nice underwater sites in my water nation games, but it's been poor for me so far.

[Velusion]

Salamander8 said:
I'm having bad luck with this as well. I usually find quite a few nice underwater sites in my water nation games, but it's been poor for me so far.

Check the Gems score graph. There are your underwater gems...