Initiative: EA game. "Grow that Nub!" - Page 12

Samhain · #**111** September 20th, 2012, 07:22 PM

HoleyDooley and curtadams,

Well done fighting through to the bitter end. That's not always easy, and both of you did a commendable job of it. I'll certainly keep that in mind the next time I run into either of you in another game.

Best of luck.

HoleyDooley · #**112** September 20th, 2012, 07:44 PM

No problem, I enjoyed the game and learnt some valuable lessons.

Enjoy the rest of the game guys.

HD

Austen · #**113** September 21st, 2012, 03:02 PM

I need some extra time.. I added 24 hours to be safe, but don't think I will need that long and will force host when I'm done to prevent unnecessary delays.

KeithZ · #**114** September 23rd, 2012, 01:38 PM

I need a 24 hours delay for this turn....

And I have to end my NAP-3 with Caelum now, will start to attack them from turn 57.

Austen · #**115** September 23rd, 2012, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KeithZ

I need a 24 hours delay for this turn....

And I have to end my NAP-3 with Caelum now, will start to attack them from turn 57.

Added extension. Should we just go to 72 hour turn?

Also, to be clear, we script attacks on Turn 57 and see results on 58?

Samhain · #**116** September 23rd, 2012, 08:54 PM

I'm good with 72 hours. It seems pretty appropriate for this stage of the game. With Pangea out and quick host enabled, we can always go faster anyway when we are able.

Austen · #**117** October 8th, 2012, 09:38 AM

Sorry about the delays.. I have just been slammed (and I don't know what to do about C'Tis' thugs). I will have it in tonight though.

KeithZ · #**118** October 8th, 2012, 09:56 AM

It's ok. Actually I have much more problems than you do...
But shall we find a sub for r'lyeh or maybe just turn him into AI?

Austen · #**119** October 8th, 2012, 11:03 AM

I've been thinking about that.. could do either.. no neither

At this stage, I was sort of thinking about just leaving them be and ruling their provinces to be unavailable.

Getting a sub or setting AI could both impact the game balance pretty severely. Right now I think the game is pretty even. A human or AI deciding to go after someone would essentially take that player out.

After this many turns, I would sort of hate to see the game decided that way. I'm open to other thoughts tho of course.

Austen · #**120** October 8th, 2012, 01:25 PM

Hmm.. no editing I guess.. first line should say

"can do either or neither"