|
|
|
|
|
November 1st, 2007, 10:35 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 500km from Ulm
Posts: 2,279
Thanks: 9
Thanked 18 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
Quote:
Saber Cherry said:
5) The 1.11 AI seems very happy to make treaties now. TOO happy. Every turn I get bombarded with messages requesting some changes in my existing treaties, which is really tedious and annoying. Could you perhaps make the AI a little more content, so that a given empire won't try to renegotiate treaties more often than ever 20 turns or so? With 10 treaties, I get 1-3 renegotiation requests every turn.
6) The AI is VERY happy to propose and accept tech-sharing treaties.
|
I second this.
The AI is way too happy to get everyone into a big intersettling-and-common-research treaty. Or maybe relations get "amiable" too easily, dunno. However, it doesn't make sense if I have shared system view of all systems in a large galaxy on turn 48 just because I didn't refuse that treaty with one AI accidently ...
All in all, though, I find the mod very enjoyable and quite an improvent over the base game. Thanks.
__________________
As for AI the most effective work around to this problem so far is to simply use an American instead, they tend to put up a bit more of a fight than your average Artificial Idiot.
... James McGuigan on rec.games.computer.stars somewhen back in 1998 ...
|
November 1st, 2007, 10:44 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
Quote:
MasterChiToes said:
Is it normal for every last AI to cancel their treaties with you on the SAME turn?
|
Sounds like you triggered the mega evil settings.
|
November 2nd, 2007, 01:07 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
Is there a way to mod-out the mega evil settings?
|
November 2nd, 2007, 02:19 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
There is a line in settings.txt:
AI Uses Mega Evil Empire := True
|
November 2nd, 2007, 06:42 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
The problem IMO with the AI launching sats and mines from all colonies is the maximum number of units in space. The AI may very well reach this limit and then be unable to launch any units just in places where it would be needed most. Of course 2 or 3 systems away from the enemy defensive units around colonies make sense, but 10 systems away on the other side of the map is not effective. You still can have some weapon platforms as defense against some ships that may be translocated by a random event. Stealth ship however should never be able to get to your core systems: that is the job for minefields on warp points to prevent.
|
November 3rd, 2007, 02:05 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 152
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
[quote]
Arralen said:
Quote:
Saber Cherry said:
5) The 1.11 AI seems very happy to make treaties now. TOO happy. Every turn I get bombarded with messages requesting some changes in my existing treaties, which is really tedious and annoying. Could you perhaps make the AI a little more content, so that a given empire won't try to renegotiate treaties more often than ever 20 turns or so? With 10 treaties, I get 1-3 renegotiation requests every turn.
|
I'm very happy with the diplomacy AI. Ideally, the AI's wouldn't propose such comprehensive treaties so soon, but apart from that there's a range of personalities which seem to be taking into account the power of your empire and your relations with the rest of the galaxy in the way they interact with you, leading to a decent mix of allies and enemies (provided you get the right empires in your game).
__________________
"Why the blazes didn't we utilise the abandoned Martian War Machines to retain Empire? I demand immediate resignations."
|
November 3rd, 2007, 02:15 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
The AIs are actually sorted into 4 personality groups for random selection, but it doesn't look like the values (random player personality grous) in settings.txt are being used.
|
November 3rd, 2007, 03:07 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
Kwok do you know why no recon sat design is created?
In the script everything seems there for this design.
|
November 3rd, 2007, 05:23 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 5,623
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
There was a small error in the routine that affected Recon Satellites and Medical Ships. Both are working now.
In Script_AI_DesignCreation, If you replace:
Line 2505: set comp_id := Sys_Get_Best_Component_With_Ability(sys_long_Playe r_ID, comp_abil)
with...
if (comp_name <> "") then
set comp_id := Sys_Get_Component_With_Name(sys_long_Player_ID, comp_name)
else
set comp_id := Sys_Get_Best_Component_With_Ability(sys_long_Playe r_ID, comp_abil)
endif
It'll be fixed.
|
November 4th, 2007, 04:11 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Mines, Treaties, and Cluster Bombs
Thank you Kwok, that worked at least partially:
The recon sats have now two basic sensors and one tachyon sensor, which is not very useful.
And attack drones have tachyon sensors too. Is this intentional?
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|