The Council of Wyrms - Page 125

Folket · #**1241** June 19th, 2006, 04:11 AM

That seems unreasable. I will send 7 gems for turn 90 and 7 gems for turn 91.

You can't expect that a proposition can force people to do something when passed that late in a turn. I know that I do not have time to constantly observe what is happening.

Ygorl · #**1242** June 20th, 2006, 10:48 AM

Waiting for turns from Abysia, Atlantis, Ermor, Marignon, Pangaea, T'ien Ch'i, and Vanheim.
Out of breath now.

The Panther · #**1243** June 20th, 2006, 10:04 PM

Note:

The distribution of Pangaea wealth has been posted on the COW site under proclimations:
http://yarnspinners.improbable.org/W...=Proclamations
Scroll down to the end to read it.

Ygorl · #**1244** June 22nd, 2006, 03:09 PM

Waiting for Aby, Arco, Mict, Pyth, T'ien, Van.

djo · #**1245** June 25th, 2006, 04:01 PM

In the wiki under proclamations, Vanheim asked:

Quote:

Man has attacked my provinces. Since I haven't attacked anybody yet, including C'tis, aren't I NOT a nation valid to be attacked by the cruelly unfair Proposition 39? Does this make Man rogue?

As a neighbor of Man, we wonder if there are comments and/or more details from the involved parties.

Ygorl · #**1246** June 25th, 2006, 05:25 PM

[Grimbald, chief interpreter of the council rulings, speaks up]

"This was a carefully considered move, not undertaken lightly nor without much inspection of the Charter and its amendments. When Ermor moved armies into Vanheim's provinces, they ceased to belong to Vanheim and became 'under contention', co-owned by both Vanheim and Ermor. Since attacks on Ermor are allowed by Proposition 39, we sent forces in to disperse the river of undead flowing into C'tissian lands.

"I see that the Wyrm of C'tis has posted much the same explanation (as well as a counter to Vanheim's claims of innocence) in the Hall of Proclamations. I suggest that we move future discussion of this issue to that more-appropriate forum. I will bring notice of this matter to my Liege Ygorl."

Wish · #**1247** June 25th, 2006, 05:28 PM

it would indeed make him rogue

Ygorl · #**1248** June 25th, 2006, 06:01 PM

On an entirely different note, I'll be out of town Wednesday-Sunday, so I won't host Thursday (and I will probably be a bit late on Sunday).

Wish · #**1249** June 25th, 2006, 09:10 PM

one should note, since ermor voted no, they are not attackable under prop 39.

Ygorl · #**1250** June 26th, 2006, 03:23 AM

I don't think that's right. We 39ers are allowed to attack "any Nation or Pretenderate that shall attack or engage in war against Ulm or any Pretenderate or Nation ruled by any Council Wyrm that votes in favor of this proposition."

I would probably have acted differently, otherwise...

Anyway, it almost seems like you've got a grievance against me... Sheesh!