|
|
|
|
|
March 30th, 2008, 12:24 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 947
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
Okay, you are in otthegreat.
Is 9 Evil, 5 Good, 2 Neutral good? We could do 1 more Evil or Neutral perhaps. I think this would be good, though.
If Good jumps on an Evil, killing them in the first few turns or whatever, then the Neutrals will think twice before allying with Good in the beginning.
And what about the actual composition of the teams? Is everyone happy with balance? (Should we make our pretenders and start?)
|
March 30th, 2008, 01:51 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 323
Thanks: 18
Thanked 32 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
If you want another player, any side, I'm in.
I was out for the weekend and feel sooo sorry that this thread went so fast in just one weekend. Already full :-/
|
March 30th, 2008, 02:44 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Japan
Posts: 351
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
I think we could use one more neutral, we could let Kheldron be that neutral. I would be ok with it. The neutrals would still be outnumbered buy a lot but they would be a good way to balance both sides aggression.
__________________
"Talk is cheap, but if it keeps your belly full and your grave empty it is worth more than gold." - Lords of Magic Manual.
"Luck is what others call skill when they have none." - Phelean Wolf
|
March 30th, 2008, 02:54 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 159
Thanks: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
I'll take LA Ulm, or if people really want an Evil player to be LA Ermor I could take them instead. I also think that one more neutral would be good.
|
March 30th, 2008, 04:33 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: sweden
Posts: 249
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
Myself I think the third neutral could be a water nation, but not R´lyeh. It would be cool to have a neutral oceania or atlantis lurking around.
Otherwise we could have an AI water nation, just to add some unpredictable coastal attacks to the game.
|
March 30th, 2008, 04:55 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: sweden
Posts: 249
Thanks: 15
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
Quote:
Zeldor said:
At least Ylvali fits really well to evil faction
|
Flattery will get you nowhere.
|
March 30th, 2008, 05:23 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 448
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
Oh yeah, I think I'd rather be LA Arco instead of MA.
|
March 30th, 2008, 05:56 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
I could play MA R'lyeh instead of MA Ermor in the neutral faction, if people think a neutral water nation would be a good idea...
And I need to mention: in roughly two weeks I will be going on a business trip for about a week, and my spare time will be very limited indeed. I can still do my turns, but there's no way I could maintain a 24-hour turn schedule. I would need for the game to go onto a 48-hour timer for that week. If that's a huge issue, I can pull out (although I really don't want to! ; )
|
March 30th, 2008, 05:57 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 323
Thanks: 18
Thanked 32 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
Well, if you confirm I can play in this game, I'd either play MA Rlyeh or MA Pangea if Rlyeh bothers you all too much ^^
|
March 30th, 2008, 06:01 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 323
Thanks: 18
Thanked 32 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Global War, recruiting!
oops we wished for the same thing at the same time Indy
Anyway, I'm still unconfirmed so no priority issue...;-)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|