|
|
|
|
|
December 2nd, 2007, 07:43 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wizard\'s Tower
Posts: 603
Thanks: 26
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
The game seems to look for network games only in LAN and ignore internet.
Creating a server uses local IP instead of the internet one.
conclusion: cant play TCPIP on internet
|
December 3rd, 2007, 07:35 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: R'lyeh
Posts: 3,861
Thanks: 144
Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Quote:
Torin said:
The game seems to look for network games only in LAN and ignore internet.
Creating a server uses local IP instead of the internet one.
conclusion: cant play TCPIP on internet
|
That's not true. Conclusion: If you are playing on the host, use your local IP to connect to your game. You are confusing network things like this with real game limitations. Of course it is possible to play games on the WAN/Internet.
|
December 3rd, 2007, 07:46 AM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wizard\'s Tower
Posts: 603
Thanks: 26
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
you are the one confused. i couldnt connecto to other players server over intenet while i could ping his ip.
It may be possible for you.
|
December 3rd, 2007, 08:14 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Then I suggest you actually take the time to look through your computer settings and other things before you claim a bug in Dom3.
You could have one of the following problems: - firewall prevents outgoing Dom3 connections
- you have an Nvidia nForce piece of excrement network card that's gone tits up (essentially a severe case of the previous item)
- your connections are blocked by the server (unlikely, as the ping gets through)
- if it's a Windows machine running as server, particularly XP, simultaneous connections may be limited to x and your connection would be number x+1 >> blocked
- other problems related to your internet connection
I work ISP tech support and I have to deal with computer illiterate morons who find it difficult to read the brand name on their PC every day and usually it's something like the above list that causes their problems.
Anyone who knows how to operate a ping command is presumably competent to check firewall settings and other network connection related issues first. If I have to start troubleshooting similar work-related crap here, I'm going to become VERY unpleasant to be around.
One more thing if you have an nForce network card on a Windows machine: Ditch that piece of liquid sh!t as soon as you can and get yourself a proper network card. They are prone to randomly denying some or all outgoing connections when the built-in firewall functionality drivers crap out (they ALWAYS do) and at that point you need either an experienced PC hand to fix it for you, get a new network card or start looking into reinstalling your OS. If it's a laptop with an integrated nForce, you have more limited options and the problem is likely to recur.
|
December 3rd, 2007, 09:28 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Torin, the host could also be firewalled and blocking the TCP connection to the port the server is running Dom3 on.
Just because IP (ping uses ICMP messages which are constructed at the IP layer) gets through a firewall doesn't mean that a TCP request will get through. The particular port the host is trying to use may be blocked. If the host runs a telnet server on the same port you were trying, can you telnet to that port? That would be a useful exercise to determine whether TCP connectivity to that port exists.
There is a large number of TCP Dom3 games that have been run or are running over the internet. I myself have run a few dom3 games behind a NAT server. It's just not working in your particular case.
You might want to consider creating a new thread in the forum and asking for help there, since this problem has nothing to do with any bugs in the Dom3 application.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
December 3rd, 2007, 10:07 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: France
Posts: 961
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
MOD (minor and strange) :
Tried to use the following cycle of transformations...
(creature A the pretender) -> shapechange creature B (with shaphechange A, firstchape A) -> the creature B has a secondshape : creature C (with shapechange A, firstshape A) -> who has a secondshape : creature D (with shapechange A, firstshape A)
And the result is : the pretender A is directly shapechanged into creature D (creature D is displayed when the pretender is chosen, and the pretender starts as D), he can then shapechange to form A but will never have the form B or C (he gets the form D with the shapechange order when he is in form A, and the form A if wounded in form D).
(edit : it's not related to creature A being a pretender ; using a cycle of secondshapes after a shapechange seem to have this result)
(edit 2 : if I remove all shapechanges but the first (A>B) unit A can become B - B can't shapechange back to A and will take form C when wounded but the firstshape command won't work- ; if I then add a shapechange B->A, B will take form A instead of form C when wounded, even if B has secondshape C, firstshape and secondshape of B will be A)
It looks like #shapechange bugs the complex chains of transformations possible without.
|
December 4th, 2007, 05:12 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: R'lyeh
Posts: 3,861
Thanks: 144
Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Quote:
vfb said:
Just because IP (ping uses ICMP messages which are constructed at the IP layer) gets through a firewall doesn't mean that a TCP request will get through.
|
Exactly. Just because something has an IP doesn't mean that everything is access the same way over the network. If you really believe that a bug exists, you need to isolate the problem to make sure it stems from the game (check if the problem manifests with other services aswell) and post a complete description of your operating system, internet connection type and firewall with maybe settings for it (hardware/software? I wouldn't be amazed if Microsoft's Internet Connection sharing or an incorrectly set up software router would cause trouble).
Please don't take it personally, I didn't mean to set you off, but just because you are experiencing a problem doesn't mean that it has to be a bug in the game.
|
December 4th, 2007, 09:51 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: France, south
Posts: 100
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Hello everybody.
I report something I'm not sure is new, but I can't find anything on it (so, finding something relevant in this entire very active forum is now a big difficulty ...).
When you're on the map csreen and selecting a province with a hidden commander of yours in it (scout or something), you can see that there is discovered magic sites, but can not have access to the details.
In the Nation Screen, you CAN: with a right-clic, as for yours ...
I figure that it is NOT INTENDED.
I don't see it in the bug shortlist, or at least don't find it ... This issue is not a big pain nor a big problem, but just another annoying thing.
And perhaps something which can be corrected very easily. I don't know.
Well, I'm done.
You're welcome to flame me if I repeat something allready known
__________________
QXel
The One Who Only Play Single Player Games For Fun, Who Is Not A Maniac of 'The Ultimate Tactic', The Negation of 'The Ugly But Very Efficient Micro-Management For Winning With Minimum Losses And Ascend All The Time'
|
December 4th, 2007, 10:09 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Known and not considered a bug as such. Or if it is, it should be covered by this shortlist item:
- BHV Nation Overview & Scouting Reports It used to be that in Dom2 spies were able to see the sites of the province they were in. This is not possible anymore (they just see the icons). However, if you lay siege to an enemy castle, you will be able to see the sites in that province fully through the Nation Overview screen. Is this WAD due to the nature of the F1 screen and the special situation of sieges?
I tested this to some degree at one point when I was investigating it. It's a minor glitch at best.
|
December 4th, 2007, 11:35 AM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: France, south
Posts: 100
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Yep.
I missed it as I search for Nation Screen ... not Nation Overview ...
But it is not really described as it is.
Well, never mind, I just do my 'pinailleur'
As I said, this is really minor, so, let's correct the real troubles.
A remark: progress page is down today ( http://ulm.illwinter.com/dom3/dom3progress.html). Troubles ?
__________________
QXel
The One Who Only Play Single Player Games For Fun, Who Is Not A Maniac of 'The Ultimate Tactic', The Negation of 'The Ugly But Very Efficient Micro-Management For Winning With Minimum Losses And Ascend All The Time'
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|