|
|
|
 |
|

August 27th, 2008, 03:10 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
You have more than one.... trophy? 
|

August 27th, 2008, 03:35 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
It's not so much a trophy as... a font. A font of immaculum.
Jazzepi, immortal
|

August 27th, 2008, 08:21 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Question:
Does NAP3 mean by definiton a lasting non-aggression pact that won't end until either of the nations declares so, and after that declaration you can only attack after 3 turns?
Just a bit mixed up with the terms, when there's NAP3 or a 3t NAP and someone mentioned a NAP +3 ...
|

August 27th, 2008, 10:59 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
There are two different things..
A nap of a certain duration, or a nap of infinite duration, which only expires a number of turns after notification.
So for example, when I say nap + 3, it means a nap that continues indefinitely until the 3rd turn after either party notifies.
|

August 27th, 2008, 11:03 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 525
Thanks: 17
Thanked 17 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
NAP3 or a 3t NAP and someone mentioned a NAP +3, they are all the same. Unless specifically stating NAP shall last how many turns then expire, all should be considered indefinate until notice is given + how many turns specified in NAP agreement.
|

August 27th, 2008, 08:41 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Else it is a Peace Accord, or some such thing, an Armistice perhaps. Of course, it's hard to expect so many complicated terms thrown about on the internets, especially in a multi-lingual community.
But still, I don't see what's wrong with telling someone, "you're my ***** now, and I'll give you 3 turns eviction notice when I come to take your stuff".

|

August 28th, 2008, 04:59 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 604
Thanks: 26
Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Pangaea would advise Ashdod to move no further north as we lay claim to those territories 200 and 209. Failure to heed this warning could result in the loss of your army.
|

August 28th, 2008, 02:37 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
This map with no natural barriers sure leads to a lot of early bumper cars, and spear shaking. 
|

August 28th, 2008, 03:03 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 525
Thanks: 17
Thanked 17 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Fortunately we have diplomacy. 
|

August 28th, 2008, 05:30 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 477
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
I'm sorry to disagree with the fine nation of Pangaea but province 209 is under the dominion of the Nation of Man, or at least will be unless something unexpected occurs between now and tomorrow.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|