|
|
|
|
|
November 7th, 2008, 11:11 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 2,066
Thanks: 109
Thanked 162 Times in 118 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micah
Yeah, 12/26 certainly changes the focus from dominating the map to trying to grab enough VPs to win.
|
I don't think I agree. Even if you're grabbing VPs, the ability to take a minimum of 8 enemy capitals is a pretty good sign that you're dominating the map already.
|
November 8th, 2008, 04:33 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
Ok, here is .map file with all neighbours and terrains. Please take a look at it to make sure there are no mistakes I will fix .tga a bit to mark towns and some blocked connections around central caps.
|
November 9th, 2008, 07:52 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 604
Thanks: 26
Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gregstrom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micah
Yeah, 12/26 certainly changes the focus from dominating the map to trying to grab enough VPs to win.
|
I don't think I agree. Even if you're grabbing VPs, the ability to take a minimum of 8 enemy capitals is a pretty good sign that you're dominating the map already.
|
Yeah but you could technically have two people controlling 8 enemy capitals. Or in fact it is even possible for two people to gain control of 12 VP's on the same exact turn even. What then?? Its probably not a big deal because the chances of it happening that way are not terribly likely but it is a possibility, and it would be pretty screwed up if it happened.
|
November 9th, 2008, 07:58 PM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
Too unlikely to bother worrying about I reckon.
|
November 9th, 2008, 08:18 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 604
Thanks: 26
Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
By the way, we were supposed to PM our Team nation choices to Zeldor right? instead of posting them in the thread.. I sent our teams picks to Zeldor a day or two ago I think but have not heard anything yet.
|
November 9th, 2008, 08:31 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
I am waiting for other teams, still 6 teams need to submit their picks. I got yours
|
November 9th, 2008, 10:20 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Douglasville, Ga
Posts: 604
Thanks: 26
Thanked 20 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
Oh, I may have noticed a problem with the map. I'm not sure.
It looks like province 400 is supposed to connect to 408 but instead it connects to 404
I'm just going by how the colored tunnels look but I would think that that is how you wanted it to be.
|
November 9th, 2008, 10:25 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeldor
I am waiting for other teams, still 6 teams need to submit their picks. I got yours
|
did you get ours zel?
our perhaps you can say who you're waiting on ...
Last edited by chrispedersen; November 9th, 2008 at 10:38 PM..
|
November 10th, 2008, 03:37 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
PsiSoldier:
Hah, thanks! Indeed, 400 should link to 408 instead of 404.
I have team picks from:
Micah + QM
Coobe + Ferrosol
PsiSoldier + Executor
Atul + Evilhomer
DrP + Gregstrom
JimMorrison + MadFrancis
WingedDog + Pretorian
With 7 nations making their picks there are no conflicts over their 1st choices so far.
|
November 10th, 2008, 06:55 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Preponderance - Big Team Game! [closed]
Hold up, hold up, did I miss something? I thought we weren't allowed to have superteams? Micah+QM? Oh ye gods. I know that QM doesn't have the best MP record, but that's just because his *diplomacy* is poor, which is a very thin candy shell around the pure hurting of which he is made. As for Micah - I believe that the no-teams-of-two-veterans rule has him in mind specifically, no?
*Both* of those players are better than I am, and I think I must be in the upper 50%.
Obviously, it's too late to shuffle teams: in compensation, put them in the middle or give them 4 points or set them on fire or something.
Of course, when they win anyway, it'll be gruesome humiliation for all concerned.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|