OT of OT: Rating Fyron -- no longer possible

[dogscoff]

It's a well known and documented historical fact that Jesus was into Slayer, Megadeth and Def Leppard.

I'll leave you all to draw your own conclusions.

Oh, and whoever talked about judging people by their shoes..? I agree. 90% of the time I find that people wearing big, solid boots (as casual shoes) are good people.

[Atrocities]

Rating system

* Ruler of The World
** Vice Roy
*** General
**** Captain
***** PFC

By these standards, I would guess the Fyron is RotW HE IS!!!!

[Gryphin]

dogscoff he was also into line dancing.

[minipol]

Originally posted by dogscoff:
It's a well known and documented historical fact that Jesus was into Slayer, Megadeth and Def Leppard.

It's also a known fact he liked Sepultura, at least their early work.

[Aloofi]

Originally posted by minipol:
It's also a known fact he liked Sepultura, at least their early work.

Well, I don't think that guy ever existed, and if he did he should have been cruxified 20 times over for all the crimes his followers have done to the rest of humankind.
And Sepultura first album, the "Schizophrenia" was pretty good but the production quality was not up to the standars of the time. Only with "Beneath the Remains" they got a real piece of art. I would easily rate Beneath the remains as the best Metal album of 1989.

[Aloofi]

I just go 2 more Ratings of one star because of the Moon Hoax thread, so I'll follow Fyron taking my rating from public. I should have known better.
What was I thinking?
How could I say that the Moon landings were faked in a sci-fi forum?
This is just like saying that the New Testament was faked in a christian forum......
Lol, talk about faith....

[geoschmo]

Originally posted by Aloofi:
What was I thinking?
How could I say that the Moon landings were faked in a sci-fi forum?
This is just like saying that the New Testament was faked in a christian forum......
Lol, talk about faith....

Actually it's not quite the same Aloofi. As a person who believes in both the New testament and the moon landings I can see the difference in the two.

For my belief in the New Testament I have only my faith to rely on.

For the moon landings I have quantifiable, observable evidence and credible eyewitness testimony. Actually to disregard the moon landings as a hoax I would have to accept on faith the exsistance of a vast conspiracy and believe the claims of fakery which are quite easily seen to be irrational at best and out right dishonest at worst.

One giant leap of faith is quite enough for me thank you. I'll keep my faith in the New Testament and rely on the evidence for my acceptance of the fact of the moon landings.

Geoschmo

[ March 06, 2003, 14:18: Message edited by: geoschmo ]

[raynor]

I've read all the evidence that supports the stuff in the New Testament. There's quite a bit of it. But I've always taken it on faith that we went to the moon. I mean, it seems like we probably *might* be able to do it. I'm not really sure *why* we would want to though. (Yeah, yeah, some junk about competing with the Russians or something.) Anyways, yeah, if you have some evidence other than pictures of the side of the moon that we can't see, I'd like to see it.

[Growltigger]

Personally, I am sure that they did land on the moon back in 1969. The cold war with Russia was still going strong at that time and I am sure the Russians (as well as anyone else with the capability) had telescopes tracking the lander and would have shouted out loud if the Americans had in fact gone for a quick spin round the earth, dicked about with the Van Halen belt (maybe air guitared to "Eruption") and then came home clutching a piece of pumice and saying "oooh, look what we found"

[ZeroAdunn]

Fyron: No, you take Science on faith to be true. Because you can't prove any of it.

And your veiled insults towards others need to stop.