|
|
|
View Poll Results: Should these nations be banned or not ?
|
Ban Ryleh LA
|
|
6 |
40.00% |
Ban Emor LA
|
|
5 |
33.33% |
Ban Ulm MA
|
|
4 |
26.67% |
Ban Agartha EA
|
|
4 |
26.67% |
Keep Ryleh LA
|
|
10 |
66.67% |
Keep Ermor LA
|
|
9 |
60.00% |
Keep Ulm MA
|
|
7 |
46.67% |
Keep Agartha EA
|
|
7 |
46.67% |
|
|
March 27th, 2012, 06:57 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 341
Thanks: 3
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
Yeah, I can say the treachery. I'm a nation. And another nation, who has neighbours, attacked me after offering a NAP that I accepted.
Hope it helped :P
|
March 27th, 2012, 08:10 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 119
Thanks: 5
Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by triqui
Yeah, I can say the treachery. I'm a nation. And another nation, who has neighbours, attacked me after offering a NAP that I accepted.
Hope it helped :P
|
Well... you could have sent a message to everyone in the ingame messaging system so this way we would at least know that Nation A got betrayed by Nation B, so we could be careful of Nation B negotiations. Might be a bit late to do that and keep your nation anonymous, though.
|
March 28th, 2012, 07:48 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 341
Thanks: 3
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
Errr. Whatever. Forget what I said, completelly my fault.
I sent the message with the aproval of the NAP to the WRONG nation. It's my first game with one unified age mod. There was no treachery, just me being dense
|
March 28th, 2012, 08:04 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 510
Thanks: 2
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
Your human mate. Don't fret about it.
Oh and I wasn't one of the parties in this mix up.
I am in some other part of the world grimly holding on...just!
|
April 9th, 2012, 09:42 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 744
Thanks: 5
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
Thought I'd bump this board up!
|
April 10th, 2012, 07:25 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
i hope every1 enjoying this game as i do
There is few nations who starts to grow big but the game looks kinda balanced.
|
April 10th, 2012, 07:54 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
Btw do you want to increase the timer ? if 1/3 of peeps are for, i ll increase to 48.
|
April 10th, 2012, 08:04 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 517
Thanks: 17
Thanked 35 Times in 24 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
I'm okay with the current timer, but I imagine there's others who might like it increased, LA Ermor and R'lyeh especially.
|
April 10th, 2012, 08:12 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 624
Thanks: 34
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
I'm fine with the current timer.
|
April 10th, 2012, 08:22 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,398
Thanks: 64
Thanked 30 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Blood Bowl - Single age (Running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Admiral_Aorta
I'm okay with the current timer, but I imagine there's others who might like it increased, LA Ermor and R'lyeh especially.
|
not sure, they look both quite weak cause both dogpiled. i might be wrong though.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|