|
|
|
 |
|

September 1st, 2008, 10:07 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 274
Thanks: 20
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
The brave soldiers of Ulm have defeated the invaders! After slaying the Wyrm-god of Abysia we also destroyed one of their vengeful armies. But Ulm is hard-pressed! Now the ape-people of Bandar-Log have also attacked the Iron Kingdom and we were forced to kill their elephants.
Enemies be warned: you will pay dearly for every inch of our land, be it lush plains or desolate wasteland. Long live ULM!!
|

September 1st, 2008, 10:20 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
I suspect they just want your tasty delicious gem income that you have worked so hard for.
P.S.: Ulm's PD is so good.
Last edited by AreaOfEffect; September 1st, 2008 at 10:34 PM..
|

September 2nd, 2008, 12:18 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
Either way I believe chris might have staled anyhow considering the original deadline was early today, not sometime tomorrow as he perceived.
|
No. I met all the deadlines as published by llamaserver, except this one which was moved up. I even said I was going to be away labor day weekend!
I think it wasn't kosher to move it up AoE; moving it up, after a server outage, after an upgrade, and after a request not to -but it can't really be undone at this point - so whats the point?
Anyway the position has some strong positivies. I'm not dropping as it isn't playable, I'm dropping because of disgust. But I'll help a sub anyway I can, to minimize disruption.
|

September 2nd, 2008, 12:32 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
I'm sorry you're disgusted. You've already placed yourself as AI. The only way to undo that as far as I know is to roll back the previous turn. Yet, if we are going to roll back one turn then why not two?
I'm personally not going to decide on this though as it has way too many consequences. Those already embroiled in war would obviously change many of their actions based on the results of previous failures. If all of the players are for it then I'm willing to do the roll backs, but only if their is a reasonable consensus.
|

September 2nd, 2008, 12:57 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 274
Thanks: 20
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Sorry, I'm fighting a two-front war that has barely gone ok for me thus far...my enemies would greatly benefit from a two-turn rollback whereas I would probably make the same choices but with less benefits.
So I'm against a rollback.
|

September 2nd, 2008, 01:37 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrispedersen
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
Either way I believe chris might have staled anyhow considering the original deadline was early today, not sometime tomorrow as he perceived.
|
No. I met all the deadlines as published by llamaserver, except this one which was moved up. I even said I was going to be away labor day weekend!
I think it wasn't kosher to move it up AoE; moving it up, after a server outage, after an upgrade, and after a request not to -but it can't really be undone at this point - so whats the point?
Anyway the position has some strong positivies. I'm not dropping as it isn't playable, I'm dropping because of disgust. But I'll help a sub anyway I can, to minimize disruption.
|
Little late. You can't undo going AI.
Jazzepi
|

September 2nd, 2008, 02:28 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Umm... does changing to AI violate a NAP? 
|

September 2nd, 2008, 03:01 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 525
Thanks: 17
Thanked 17 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
You may attack AI freely. It will certainly do so.
|

September 2nd, 2008, 03:47 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 293
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Yeah, moving the deadline up was a bad idea :0p but mistakes happen
|

September 2nd, 2008, 11:01 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
I understand that now anticipatient. I'm also really bummed out about the whole affair. The concensus seems to be against the only way to correct the situation. This is a mistake that will not be reapeated as I truely wish everyone to enjoy this game.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|