|
|
|
|
|
June 3rd, 2008, 04:39 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 39
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug thread
Youre right Edi, im sorry for taking your time, if you want, you can delete these posts.
|
June 3rd, 2008, 05:06 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug thread
It's okay. We all make mistakes. Don't worry.
Oh, and WAD = Working As Designed. I had to come up with something to shorten that to because when the I began compiling the bug shortlist, there was a lot of stuff that was being reported as a bug when it was either a feature request or it was, as the acronym says, working as it was supposed to.
Take a look at the shortlist (sticky thread) to get an idea of what we know about and how to report bugs. It is always better to have too much detail than too little when getting bug reports, because extra can be cut out but you can't make information out of nothing.
|
June 3rd, 2008, 10:08 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Small Bug - maybe reported
when you save hinnom pretenders from game tools.. they report as early_gath.
Chris
|
June 4th, 2008, 01:36 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Small Bug - maybe reported
Yes, and it's WAD. That's likely because Gath was the first one of the three to be done. The pretender saving and nation description, brief and summary assignment in the actual game code is severely suboptimal for purposes of managing mods and other similar things.
That section should, in my opinion, be revamped, but whether Illwinter feels the same way is a different thing entirely. It is going to come up for discussion once I finish the 3.17 Dom3 DB and start working on the modding shortlist.
|
June 4th, 2008, 05:46 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Small Bug - maybe reported
From the description of "Enliven Marble Oracle" spell:
"...these telestic animates lumber to and fro in the..."
Should be:
"...these telestic animates lumber to and from in the..."
|
June 4th, 2008, 06:00 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Small Bug - maybe reported
That's not a bug nor is it a typo. To move to and fro is a saying, it is grammatically correct.
|
June 4th, 2008, 06:38 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Small Bug - maybe reported
Yes, it means "back and forth."
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|
June 4th, 2008, 07:35 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 1,449
Thanks: 4
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Small Bug - maybe reported
Actually "to and fro" is perfectly acceptable. Not sure if it is intentional though
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/to-and-fro
EDIT: Oops, didn't notice there was an extra page
__________________
I'm in the IDF. (So any new reply by me is a very rare event.)
|
June 4th, 2008, 09:20 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Major modding bug
This is a serious bug which pretty much prevents new mod nations from working.
It appears that #custommagic and #magicskill don't work or have been changed somehow by the new patch. No modded magic users or priests have any paths. Holy, blood, 100% FEW random, doesn't matter - none of it shows up any more.
|
June 4th, 2008, 11:34 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Major modding bug
That bug is peculiar to your system, Sombre. I don't have any problems with my Ermor mod working exactly as it should, whether I make the Shadow Priestess a completely new unit with a new monster number or whether I use an existing unused monster that I replace. I'd need more confirmation of this before I shortlist it.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|