OT: Playing a RPG Online: is anyone interested? - Page 2

Argitoth · #11 December 23rd, 2003, 08:16 PM

I vote for D&D, 3rd Edition.

don't have 3.5 books though

[ December 23, 2003, 18:20: Message edited by: Argitoth ]

narf poit chez BOOM · #12 December 23rd, 2003, 08:17 PM

you got a couple of points, Fyron.

if you post in this forum, please indicate wether your interested or just chatting so i can get an accurate count, please.

Alneyan · #13 December 23rd, 2003, 08:17 PM

Agreed Fyron, playing via IM would be much better if it can be done. I believe you have quite a good chance of finding enough players in the same time zone (or in a time zone close enough) so it should be possible to do so. (Once a DM is found that is.

)

Edit: I am interested, but I cannot play via IM. (Different time zone, my connection isn't up 24 hours a day, and is as reliable as Geoschmo ISP. So it wouldn't quite work.

)

[ December 23, 2003, 18:24: Message edited by: Alneyan ]

Fyron · #14 December 23rd, 2003, 08:22 PM

I believe I implied I was interested... I think all that cheese has gone to your head.

Fyron · #15 December 23rd, 2003, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Argitoth:
I vote for D&D, 3rd Edition.

don't have 3.5 books though

I don't have 3.5 books either, and probably won't ever get them... There is nothing wrong with the 3.0 books. 3.5 is mostly just reorganization, and changing a few subtle rules.

Fyron · #16 December 23rd, 2003, 08:24 PM

You know... we could always go on #se4 and flesh the idea out more.

narf poit chez BOOM · #17 December 23rd, 2003, 08:36 PM

i guess my perfectionism was rearing it's head. i got a large dose of it that pops up in unexpected places. besides, you were argueing against it before.

oh, and you can edit.

i'm of to see the IRC, the wonderful IRC of #SE4...

narf poit chez BOOM · #18 December 23rd, 2003, 10:22 PM

ok, i'm available from about 6 PM GMT to 8 AM GMT monday to some of saturday. can vary by about 2 hours without much trouble.

[ December 23, 2003, 20:34: Message edited by: narf poit chez BOOM ]

ZeroAdunn · #19 December 23rd, 2003, 10:34 PM

on 3.5: I have to disagree with you fully on 3.5 fyron.

3.5 has a lot of new stuff, yes things are more organized, but their are also a lot of improvements. First of the ranger is actually a viable class now, whearas before, the ranger (and the paladin for that matter) where heavily front loaded, making it only worthwhile to take one or two levels of them. The ranger is also a lot more of a woodsmen now then he was before, before he was just an alternate fighter. The skills are a lot more fleshed out, there are some new feats (albiet most of the new feats are just taken from other sources)

A lot of spells have been modified (like jump, which bugs the crap out of me) some for the better.

Taera · #20 December 23rd, 2003, 10:38 PM

well, i'll be interested. if you need to, i CAN DM(even tho i have no previous experience. nevertheless.) for my available times? Well, lets say any day from 6pm to 9pm (GMT -7), and more time on holidays -- probably.

As for the setting, i'm not familiar with 3.5 edition, but it cant be that difficult to learn now that i'm quite familiar with 3rd edition.

As for the program, AIM has something special for rp's, i'll ask friends that i know are playing RP's there.

[ December 23, 2003, 20:38: Message edited by: Taera ]