|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
November 6th, 2008, 07:21 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG
What I AM confident of is no matter what we do somebody will find some info somewhere , maybe now, maybe a year from now, that disagrees with the values we have put into the OOB and someone else will eventually disagree with them. I've been doing this too long NOT to be cynical about things like this.
Certainly I could add "reevaluate T-72M1 data" into the already 46 page long "to-do" list, In fact, I already have. Given the time I have available to work on this anymore there may even be a slight chance I'll be able to.
Given the number of nations that use the tank and,as "Griefbringer" already noted, the Finn versions will be different than stock T72's use by other nations and that could/ would apply to most of the other nations that use these tanks so what may apply to the Finns many not apply to the other nations that use it and I can GUARANTEE if I blanket change all of them to one standard someone else will complain and with 11 nations using the T-72M1 in the game there is next to no chance of getting reliable info on each and every one
Don
|
First of all, I apologize for mistaking you with Mobhack. (time to get new eyeglasses)
Will it help you if I hunt for some (seemingly) useful posts regarding the issue from the tanknet?
Or is it better to drop out and just let the CAMO team have its own way?
Regarding the researching armor values, ammunitions, and whatnot, maybe you can partially "out-source" the task?
Say, about the T-72M1 that I've been talking about, I think you can throw in the question in some enthusiastic communities, look at what they come up with, and use them as auxiliary sources if the logic behind the claim is plausible and sources backing the claim are reliable.
BTW, regarding the Finnish T-72:
http://208.84.116.223/forums/index.p...dpost&p=613526
|
November 7th, 2008, 12:02 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,490
Thanks: 3,960
Thanked 5,696 Times in 2,813 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
Real information is always welcome. Telling me you think something is wrong without concrete info on what should be changed to isn't
--
Czech unit 18 may be closer to "reality" for the M1 series armour in general but it has a low side hull armour. All the Czech T-72's units have low hull side armour in comparision to other T-72's. Why ? IDK. 13 is standard .
Something else to look into.......
Don
Last edited by DRG; November 7th, 2008 at 12:34 PM..
|
November 7th, 2008, 02:09 PM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
The cold war export T-72s are interesting beasts. Since they were built under license in several nations and were aquired by several others with the skills to fiddle with them there is scope for a considerable variation, though probably not massive in terms of actual performance.
From what I have understood there were three basic model
1) An initial version made available since 1979. It had a cast steel turret and a composite glacis.
2) T-72M, introduced during the80's. Same armor scheme as the above but with improved systems (laser instead of optical rangefinder, more accurate gun etc).
3) Finally the T-72M1 also introduced in the 80's. Composite turret and strenghtened glacis.
Several subvariants probably have existed. T-72M may have received additional steel glacis plate (done inEast Germany IIRC)
to be at least partially brought up to T-72M1 protection standards. Basic T-72 may have been upgraded with laser rangefinders
and improved systems. Some manufacturers may have fiddled with T-72M1 front turret cavities composite fillers etc. Some locally assembled iraqi
T-72M1 Assad babylon appear to have appliquè armor on the turret front. This of course before the end of the cold war. All the sort of upgrades
may have been carried out since then (typically along the lines of ERA being fitted, better FCS etc.)
Some food for thought in the following links
http://img392.imageshack.us/img392/1...striderpz7.jpg
http://www.angelfire.com/mi4/armania...t72/T72M1.html
http://208.84.116.223/forums/index.p...cavities&st=20
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Marcello For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 7th, 2008, 04:59 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kladno, Czech Republic
Posts: 1,176
Thanks: 12
Thanked 49 Times in 44 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
Marcello, judging from Czechoslovakia:
At first came T-72 "Ural", directly from the USSR. Stereo RF etc. Never upgraded to LRF (or smoke dischargers etc) , but OTOH there were just 30 pieces delivered.
T-72M-E2 - T-72A glacis, "gill" sideskirts, plain steel turret, 39 rounds (as in T-72), LRF. Smoke dischargers may be added to some pieces later, ditto for HHS.
T-72M-E4 - glacis with HHS plate (17mm), full-length skirts, plain steel turret, 44 rounds, LRF, smoke dischargers.
T-72M1 - glacis with HHS plate, full-length skirts, composite turret (sandbars), 44 rounds, LRF, dischargers.
To make matters worse, army often calls all T-72 (except the old ones) "T-72M". Funny, innit?
__________________
This post, as well as being an ambassador of death for the enemies of humanity, has a main message of peace and friendship.
|
November 7th, 2008, 05:06 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcello
|
Comment of mr. Rick Griest about the link:
http://208.84.116.223/forums/index.p...dpost&p=282618
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Companion For This Useful Post:
|
|
November 8th, 2008, 10:05 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 55 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marek_Tucan
Marcello, judging from Czechoslovakia:
At first came T-72 "Ural", directly from the USSR. Stereo RF etc. Never upgraded to LRF (or smoke dischargers etc) , but OTOH there were just 30 pieces delivered.
T-72M-E2 - T-72A glacis, "gill" sideskirts, plain steel turret, 39 rounds (as in T-72), LRF. Smoke dischargers may be added to some pieces later, ditto for HHS.
T-72M-E4 - glacis with HHS plate (17mm), full-length skirts, plain steel turret, 44 rounds, LRF, smoke dischargers.
T-72M1 - glacis with HHS plate, full-length skirts, composite turret (sandbars), 44 rounds, LRF, dischargers.
To make matters worse, army often calls all T-72 (except the old ones) "T-72M". Funny, innit?
|
Looks pretty typical.
Quote:
Comment of mr. Rick Griest about the link:
|
Agree that it should be taken with a big pinch of salt (I for one I don't buy the armor estimate provided) but I thought that something useful could be extracted.
|
December 10th, 2008, 12:34 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Italy
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
Being interested in this, in time I've collected what information I could gather about the T-72 seemingly-endless variants. Most of this come from a Tank_net thread of some time ago, and from this one as well (Marek you'll recognize much of this as yours ).
I hope it can be of some help, and in (very likely) case of some needed corrections/addenda please let me know.
|
December 15th, 2008, 12:13 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 234
Thanks: 36
Thanked 53 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
I would like to ask a question about T-72s since there are so many knowledgeable people in this thread. Could someone identify this type for me?
|
December 15th, 2008, 12:49 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 112
Thanks: 1
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
Based on the apparently Finnish national markings on the side, I'd have to say that it's a T-72M1. Bought from either the USSR or alternatively ex-DDR surplus stocks.
- Koh
|
December 15th, 2008, 01:18 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 234
Thanks: 36
Thanked 53 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: T-72M1 question
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koh
Based on the apparently Finnish national markings on the side, I'd have to say that it's a T-72M1. Bought from either the USSR or alternatively ex-DDR surplus stocks.
- Koh
|
Thanks for your reply. The photo is from a Vietnamese guy’s personal blog. He posted a bunch of pictures of armoured vehicles with the Vietnamese People’s Army. The other pictures were labelled and clearly Vietnamese. This one wasn’t. Vietnam purchased 150 T-72s from Poland in 2005. Could it be a Polish T-72M1 with the VPA?
It could of course be a Finnish T-72. The blogger may have posted a picture of a Finnish T-72 to represent a Vietnamese T-72!
Last edited by redcoat2; December 15th, 2008 at 01:35 PM..
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|