|
|
|
|
|
April 19th, 2005, 04:01 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Searching for a holy grail.
Posts: 1,001
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
It makes sense.
But I think it's wrong. You will never get then anti-technology evolving at the same rate as the technology. It's not until you know what your fighting against that you can develop an effective counter-measure. So the first use of a clever technology will normally have the edge as no-one has developed the appropriate counter-measures.
So very rarely have a force with a clever weapon and only that clever weapon met a force with the exact clever anti-weapon. In fact the counter-tech tends to be cleverer than the tech it was designed to counter. Take the tank, originally designed just to cross no-mans land and beat machine gun emplacements. Look what it became.
__________________
He who disagrees with me in private, call him a fool. He who disagrees with me in public, call him an ambulance.
|
April 19th, 2005, 08:38 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 280
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
With regard to the Icaran military only:
Yes, by World War II standards it does seem extremely low in manpower relative to the population, although as El_Phil pointed out there are a lot more people "behind the scenes" supporting the military: R&D, construction, merchant navy (moving resources back and forth), supply, maintenance, etc. that SEIV doesn't explicitly include.
Note that even this minuscule military is probably an overestimate. Given likely advances in 25th Century automation, a crew of 6,000+ for a super dreadnought seems wildly excessive. Personally I don't have a clue what the 25th Century will look like, but I'll bet it includes AI's with REAL "I" and highly advanced robots/droids of some sort, capable of far more than Star Wars-type comic relief.
On the bright side, having a small military means the Navy can recruit the best of the best of the best; probably the lowest swabbie on the ship is an Olympic-class athlete and chess grandmaster with a Ph.D. or three. You won't find this guy swabbing decks, either.
|
April 20th, 2005, 12:39 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,389
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
Well in regards to the Icaran Empire and AI to put it frankly they don't trust AIs and they believe in the "Supreme Dominance of Man" so basically trusting a machine over man is considered utter foolishness.
BTW they are more like 32nd century tech as they never had the dark ages in their history
But again basically for them it's a matter of "God made man supreme among creation so we should not trust a computer to perform those jobs man should do himself." By our standards Icaran factories are also remarkably unautomated except where necessary, this serves the double purpose of making sure very few Icaran citizens ever have to fear homlesness as there is literally a job for almost everyone in their society.
Being that a SD is just over 2km long and has actual gunnery crews among other things I decided a crew of 6,000 is pretty reasonable.....especially when compared to how cramped I thought an ST star destroyer must be what with it's crew of 40,000 odd people crammed into 1km.
__________________
When life gives you lemons take them and squeeze them in life's eye until it gives you the oranges you asked for!
"If men build things to look like our penis such as towers and ships does that mean female achitects represent women having penis envy?"
A line that made me chuckle, I can't remember where I heard it I just know it made me laugh.
"I'm not really a slapper....I mainly punch and gouge."
Tammy Lee my kung fu instructor/sifu's daughter when asked if she ever slapped a boy for saying something nasty to her.
|
April 20th, 2005, 06:45 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 2,241
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
SH, no offence, but for some reason, when I read your last post the Icarans inevitably remind me of Nazi Germany.....
__________________
O'Neill: I have something I want to confess you. The name's not Kirk. It's Skywalker. Luke Skywalker.
-Stargate SG1
|
April 20th, 2005, 07:11 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Searching for a holy grail.
Posts: 1,001
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
They have been edging more and more that way over the course of the story, maybe it was intended but lots of little things have come together and the parallels are becoming striking.
__________________
He who disagrees with me in private, call him a fool. He who disagrees with me in public, call him an ambulance.
|
April 20th, 2005, 01:20 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,389
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
Well the belief that "God made man supreme among creation." was actually far against what Nazi Germany beleived as they were atheistic for the "official" part of their politics.
In truth the Icarans are sort of a mix of our best and worst parts of humanity, worst in that they are some of the most fanatical and specist bastards you'll ever meet, best in that they treat other humans with absolute and unswerving equality, every citizen whether noble or common born is equal in the eyes of the law.
And they have very little crime because of how strict and harsh their legal system is towards criminals.
__________________
When life gives you lemons take them and squeeze them in life's eye until it gives you the oranges you asked for!
"If men build things to look like our penis such as towers and ships does that mean female achitects represent women having penis envy?"
A line that made me chuckle, I can't remember where I heard it I just know it made me laugh.
"I'm not really a slapper....I mainly punch and gouge."
Tammy Lee my kung fu instructor/sifu's daughter when asked if she ever slapped a boy for saying something nasty to her.
|
April 20th, 2005, 02:57 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 280
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
Quote:
Well in regards to the Icaran Empire and AI to put it frankly they don't trust AIs and they believe in the "Supreme Dominance of Man" so basically trusting a machine over man is considered utter foolishness.
|
Fair enough. Luckily the Icarans haven't run up against the evil Wintel Empire.
Quote:
By our standards Icaran factories are also remarkably unautomated except where necessary, this serves the double purpose of making sure very few Icaran citizens ever have to fear homlesness as there is literally a job for almost everyone in their society.
|
Having a human do a machine's job isn't necessarily the best way to ensure full employment, but that's a whole 'nother discussion.
|
April 20th, 2005, 03:18 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 86
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
The only thing is in star track universe i believe you are saying they hae too many ships with a number more aroud 10,000. Also starfleet is considered the military of the federation. Also i believe the dominion war casualty projections were for the entire alpha quadrant, which would include federation, klingon, cardassian, breen, romulan and all the other losses which could get you somewhere up there bt still not the 900 billion.(i also thought it may have been 90 billion in the episode or something similar
|
April 21st, 2005, 05:42 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 139
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
With regards to your numbers for the Honorverse, I don't have the books with me at the moment, but it is actually spelled out in one of them - the limitation isn't in getting the bodies, it's getting the bodies without wiping out the tax payers. No tax payers, no income. No income, no military budget. No military budget, no fleets of superdreadnoughts to go boom.
|
April 21st, 2005, 07:27 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 280
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: A question about military manpower vs population
Quote:
No tax payers, no income. No income, no military budget. No military budget, no fleets of superdreadnoughts to go boom.
|
That was basically the theme of historian Paul Kennedy's book "The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers". In the beginning of the book he showed how 16th Century Spain, probably the wealthiest European nation at the time, eventually bankrupted itself through economic mismanagement and overly lavish military expenditures relative to its financial resources (i.e. taxpayers). In more recent times, the attempt to maintain an oversize military was a factor in the economic collapse and eventual dissolution of the Soviet Union.
With regard to Starhawk's story, the fact that the fictional Icarans can fight successfully with a relatively minuscule military is probably a major factor in their ability to sustain the war decade after decade.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|