|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
August 17th, 2013, 11:48 AM
|
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK / USA
Posts: 895
Thanks: 32
Thanked 281 Times in 123 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack
By all means, feel free to comment.
...
There may be a return to the simple "standardised" pistol and hand grenade ALA MBT, if we can be bothered, just to save future nit-picking on the subject though.
A simple naming system of "Rifle", "SLR", "SMG" and so on (as in the WRG tabletop rule sets) would have been best.
|
Personally, I think switching to generic infantry weapons would be a shame. I like to see nationalised weapons in the infantry sections.
But it's your ball, your rules...
Cross
|
August 19th, 2013, 06:53 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 886
Thanks: 85
Thanked 241 Times in 174 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
There's no 37mm Bofors AT-gun, which was used in North Africa. I have no precise info, when their usage started, but they were imported from Poland well before the war (BTW, the Polish soldiers were surprised to receive Polish guns at Tobruk).
059 2 Pdr AT-Gun - according to 'Anti-tank weapons WW2 Fact Files' by Chamberlain/Gander it entered service in 1938
216 25mm Portee, 591 2 Pdr Portee - have a photo of bigger 6pdr portee. Correct for 2pdr is 12536
218 6 Pdr Portee - has a photo of 2pdr - correct is 12532
Also, nice photo of 3in mortar is 601
|
August 20th, 2013, 11:46 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,489
Thanks: 3,958
Thanked 5,693 Times in 2,812 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pibwl
There's no 37mm Bofors AT-gun, which was used in North Africa. I have no precise info, when their usage started, but they were imported from Poland well before the war (BTW, the Polish soldiers were surprised to receive Polish guns at Tobruk).
|
What's Weapon 15 - 37mm MkI Bofors then ?
Quote:
..........were used mainly by 3rd RHA and 106th RHA (Lancashire Hussars) within 7th Armoured Division........and it was often carried "portee" on the back of a vehicle, although a separate limber was provided and had a crew of 5.
|
Quote:
shortly before the start of the war the Sudanese Government bought a number of 37mm Anti-Tank guns from AB Bofors of Sweden and when war broke out, these were made available to the British Army in the Western Desert
|
We use it with unit 252 " LRDG Chevy ATG" which represents it's typical application. If it was used by the Poles as an AT gun in the desert then it needs to be in the Polish OOB for that time period.
What we missed with unit 252 is that the 37mm could fire HE and YES I have aleady made a note to fix the Icon used for that unit
Don
|
August 21st, 2013, 12:54 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 886
Thanks: 85
Thanked 241 Times in 174 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
I meant a towed version which was also surely used (even portee gun was probably sometimes dismounted and put on a ground position). The quoted text says, that they were "often" used as portee, so not exclusively. But, of course, as you wish.
|
September 2nd, 2013, 05:55 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 886
Thanks: 85
Thanked 241 Times in 174 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
514 Insect class - secondary armament were 76 mm AA guns, not 2 pdr (according to Conway's and others).
Better icon IMO would be 707 - it looked like this from a top: http://warships.ru/MK-3/MK-23/efis.jpg
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Pibwl For This Useful Post:
|
|
March 24th, 2015, 07:16 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,489
Thanks: 3,958
Thanked 5,693 Times in 2,812 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
None of this is getting in. Get serious. You had a year to post this and waited until I announce the patch....... IMAGINE how little "impressed" I am at this moment.... then double it. There were plenty of hints dropped we were finishing up and from what I can see a number if these issues have already been dealt with.. you DID notice how many photos I added to the game didn't you ?
The work is locked down. The only reason its not released now is we are triple checking things but that's things already in the game NOT anything new dropped in our laps after a years work was done and I really... REALLY don't give a crap if some "new source" puts our introduction dates in the mid 30's for something that hardly anyone bothers with is now out by a few months
Last edited by DRG; March 24th, 2015 at 07:26 PM..
|
May 28th, 2021, 06:25 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 886
Thanks: 85
Thanked 241 Times in 174 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
Minor things, for 2021 release. I'm just reading "Tempest in Action", and there is some information about Typhoons.
729 Typhoon IA - bombs were adapted in late 1942 only (now 9/41). Early Typhoons were mostly used as interceptors or strafers. It says, that "ater extensive trials, the Typhoon was finally cleared to carry two 500 pound bombs under the wings and by September of 1942, Nos 181 and 182 Squadrons became he first to equip with what were sometimes known as Bombphons". But it would be Typhoon IB rather, with 20 mm cannons (icon 8307).
For bomb armed Typhoon, there is photo 8368.
Possibly it's better to make IA strafer a separate unit, so that removing of bombs from 729 unit doesn't interfere with scenarios.
183 Typhoon IB - 1000lb bombs were used operationally from early 1944 only (trials were begun in 4/43, and "it was a year later, however, before Typhoons used 1000 pound bombs in action").
It could rather use an icon with stripes, especially, that it uses early earth/green scheme.
95 Typhoon IB - photo 2354 has invasion stripes, while this is pre-6/44 unit, while 731 Typhoon IB is post-6/44 unit and has photo 850 without stripes - they might be swapped for a cake of consistency with icons.
Last edited by Pibwl; May 28th, 2021 at 06:53 PM..
|
May 28th, 2021, 06:54 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,489
Thanks: 3,958
Thanked 5,693 Times in 2,812 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pibwl
Minor things
|
No $hit really?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pibwl
95 Typhoon IB - photo 2354 has invasion stripes, while this is pre-6/44 unit, while 731 Typhoon IB is post-6/44 unit and has photo 850 without stripes - they might be swapped for a cake of consistency with icons.
|
Seriously.........Do you ever think that MAYBE you (and others) are bit too OCD about totally insignificant details and that one day all this endless frigging rivet counter nitpicking will end development once and for all of the game you (and others) profess to actually like but endlessly criticize becasuse there are only two people willing but more important CAPABLE of keeping it going ??
Hmmmm ?
If anyone reads..... "Hmmmm ... I think Dons finally getting really pissed off" into my recent posts well CONGRATULATIONS for figuring it out.
Last edited by DRG; May 28th, 2021 at 07:06 PM..
|
May 29th, 2021, 02:44 PM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Poland
Posts: 886
Thanks: 85
Thanked 241 Times in 174 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG
Seriously.........Do you ever think that MAYBE you (and others) are bit too OCD about totally insignificant details and that one day all this endless frigging rivet counter nitpicking will end development once and for all of the game you (and others) profess to actually like but endlessly criticize becasuse there are only two people willing but more important CAPABLE of keeping it going ??
|
Don't read it as "criticising". By no means I mean to criticise the games and your effort. I only try to give some hints, how to improve several details, if you'd like to. If not, please, ignore.
|
May 28th, 2021, 07:24 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 788
Thanks: 1,257
Thanked 576 Times in 313 Posts
|
|
Re: British OOB7 corrections/suggestions (v.6)
Don just ignore all this drivel it’s just useless nitpicking by two folks, every post by these two as soon as I see a gal zillion letters I just scroll by and don’t even bother.
__________________
ASL
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|