|
|
|
 |
|

June 12th, 2004, 05:39 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Quote:
Originally posted by se5a:
they were the BEST skyhawks out there with all the upgrades we did to them.
|
I know the feeling. We still use F-111's, although we upgrade them every decade. We'll be using them for another 10 years at least, when they'll be about 60 (Like flying spitfires or Mustangs in the first Gulf War). Mind you I think we'll be getting some Raptors in a few years.
Edit: I remember when the Iran-Iraq war was "The Gulf War". Then we had kuwait, then Iraq again.
|

June 12th, 2004, 05:55 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 776
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
didnt we manage to sneek one under your raidar and buzz a new ship of yours during a test/wargame a copple of years ago?
__________________
[img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Flag_NewZeland.gif[/img]
|

June 12th, 2004, 11:09 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Wouldn't know about that. I tend to remember military stuff I hear, but I don't regularly look such stuff up. My military experience only goes as far as Air Cadets until I discovered I was not allowed to fly a plane.
|

June 12th, 2004, 11:35 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Linghem, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 2,255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Sweden - Partnership or T&R with EU countries, to others Trade or neutral, depending on country.
You in NZ could propably get some fighters from us, we've ordered 204 of them, but only need 128.....
[ June 12, 2004, 10:39: Message edited by: Ruatha ]
|

June 12th, 2004, 05:18 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,205
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Canada: Probably a Partnership with the US and Britain. Maybe Military Alliance with Australia and a trade with a bunch of others.
__________________
Courage doesn't always roar. Sometimes courage is that little voice at the end of the day that says "I'll try again tomorrow".
Maturity is knowing you were an idiot in the past. Wisdom is knowing that you'll be an idiot in the future.
Download the Nosral Confederacy (a shipset based upon the Phong) and the Tyrellian Imperium, an organic looking shipset I created! (The Nosral are the better of the two [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/Grin.gif[/img] )
|

June 13th, 2004, 03:21 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Heres a list of the top empires by default as they have Stellar Torpedoes (aks: Nuclear Weapons)
1. US.
2. Russia }
3. China } I have my doubts on China and russias exact ranks as one has a large army but no money for anything. The other also has a large army but it is hopelessly out of date.
4. Britain
5. France
The top 5 also have space programs (Wormholes perhaps?)
6. India
7. Pakistan
8. Israel (I am assuming the rumours are true)
9. North Korea (Are the rumours true or not?)
I would like to place Germany in the top 10 but I do not believe they are allowed Nuclear weapons.
|

June 13th, 2004, 04:38 PM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 47
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Quote:
Originally posted by Randallw:
I would like to place Germany in the top 10 but I do not believe they are allowed Nuclear weapons.
|
no nukes in germany. we buy our enemies, not bomb they out (more civilized art of war) in near future we have also no nuclear power plants (greens in our goverment)
is this rank only military or complete score?
if military: germany is definitively not in the top 10.
if complete: maybe in the first 5.
Alliances: wanted Partnership with all EU-Members + T/R-Alliance with whole world + Military Alliance with NATO-Members.
only my opinion.
|

June 13th, 2004, 08:16 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Linghem, Östergötland, Sweden
Posts: 2,255
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
If you coun't resources and research (1 score per point in game) Japan would be fairly high I'd guess.
|

June 13th, 2004, 09:24 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Taganrog, Russia
Posts: 1,087
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Some figures:
Top ten nations/Military power (by military expenditures):
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_exp_dol_fig
code:
1. United States $276.7 billion (FY99 est.)
2. China $55.91 billion (FY02)
3. France $46.5 billion (2000)
4. Japan $39.52 billion (FY02)
5. Germany $38.8 billion (2002)
6. United Kingdom $31.7 billion (2002)
7. Italy $20.2 billion (2002)
8. Saudi Arabia $18.3 billion (FY00)
9. Brazil $13.408 billion (FY99)
10. Korea, South $13,094.3 million (FY02)
Top ten nations/Economical power (by gross domestic product): http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/eco_gdp_ppp
code:
1. United States $9,612.7 billion
2. China $5,019.4 billion
3. Japan $3,394.4 billion
4. India $2,395.4 billion
5. Germany $2,062.2 billion
6. France $1,426.6 billion
7. United Kingdom $1,404.4 billion
8. Italy $1,363.0 billion
9. Brazil $1,299.4 billion
10. Russia $1,219.4 billion
|

June 14th, 2004, 02:49 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT-RL treaties and Ranks
Quote:
Originally posted by aiken:
8. Saudi Arabia $18.3 billion (FY00)
|
The're only so high because they export radioactives to the other empires.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|