|
|
|
 |
|

January 31st, 2007, 04:58 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Thanks for all the fish!
Upgrade to Edgy, it has glibc2.4.
Should be a pretty painless upgrade, from what I know of Ubuntu. It's been released for 3-4 months, so it should be stable.
|

January 31st, 2007, 05:06 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bordeaux, France
Posts: 794
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Thanks for all the fish!
I'm not sure I like the idea of upgrading my distribution just because of this. I specifically selected 6.06 because it was the "long term support" version; I'm pretty sure there isn't much in the newest things that I need.
If I really have to upgrade my Linux distribution just because of Dom3, then I'll really be upset. I just checked the requirements on the original version, and it says libc >= 2.1.92. Whatever really required the change, I'm pretty curious.
|

January 31st, 2007, 05:38 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 272
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Thanks for all the fish!
Cheers. I'll check it out right away. 
__________________
We can't stop here. This is bog beast country!
|

January 31st, 2007, 05:50 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Thanks for all the fish!
Understood. I'm also curious what required it. If anything actually required it?
I personally wouldn't worry about the long term support, unless it was some critical server type machine. (Which probably wouldn't be running Dominions). But I like having the newest things.
On the other hand, it doesn't look like Debian unstable has libc 2.4, either. <rant> What were they thinking, requiring it!!</rant>
|

January 31st, 2007, 06:08 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Cave Provinces
I saw a topic where cave provinces were listed as "junk"??
Are cave provinces still working or just not working for the DAWN map?
__________________
There can be only one.
|

January 31st, 2007, 06:41 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 527
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cave Provinces
the patch doesn't seem to be working for me. the installer keeps giving me the message
Dominions 3 has not been totally updated because of the following
reason:
CRC Error - cannot update the following file:
C:\Program Files\dominions3\dom3.exe
You will have to run this utility again to completely update Dominions
3.
and it doesn't matter how many times i run it, it does the same thing every time. and i tried running it fresh off a restart to see if any programs i had open were screwing it up.
i just got the game in the mail today and i can't wait to play AGH!
|

January 31st, 2007, 06:47 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Cave Provinces
try installing a previous patch and then try the most recent patch.
===========
back to the questions:
I saw a topic where cave provinces were listed as "junk"??
Are cave provinces still working or just not working for the DAWN map?
__________________
There can be only one.
|

January 31st, 2007, 06:49 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 527
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cave Provinces
tryed that too. i updated to 3.04 from a fresh install then to 3.06 and the same thing happened.
|

January 31st, 2007, 06:59 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 790
Thanks: 7
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Cave Provinces
And dom3 is closed while installing?
Try to update a 3.00 version 3.06 includes all patches.
|

January 31st, 2007, 07:05 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 527
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Cave Provinces
yep its closed.
and to make sure i'm not just crazy i even uninstalled it 1 more time, deleted the directory, put a fresh install on, and tryed to patch. same problem. i'm gonna try to redownload the patch to see if it got corrupted somehow.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|