|
|
|
 |
|

December 7th, 2007, 02:14 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
It shouldn't effect forts. The discount is incredibly high.
|

December 7th, 2007, 02:15 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
The PD change to sloth sounds like painful death by micromanagement to me. If I want 3PD in every one of my 120 provinces to prevent sudden loss of empire to a horde of scouts, that's painful to check and fix every turn. Maybe capped at a minimum it might not be so bad?
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|

December 7th, 2007, 04:12 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
PD should never go down. Not ever - it might be thematic but as vfb says, it will just add micromanagment.
|

December 7th, 2007, 05:58 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: France (Paris)
Posts: 227
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
I like the affect of the PD, but the discount on build time is to powerful at level 2 => why not, only at level 3 to make it attractive ?
|

December 7th, 2007, 10:20 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: guess - and you'll be wrong
Posts: 834
Thanks: 33
Thanked 187 Times in 66 Posts
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
Adding +1 turn of construction for each level of sloth should be all you need to change the "sloth3 = default" phenomena.
|

December 7th, 2007, 10:21 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
That isn't generally my play style, but okay, no PD degeneration - I agree that anything which increases micromanagement is a non-starter.
KtB - let's assume that you build 20 forts over the entire course of a 50 turn game.
Furthermore, let's assume that every single one of them is a walled city. That's 24,000 gold. Each 10% is 2,400 gold.
Over 50 turns your income from your *capital alone* is 20,000 gold base, each level of order is 1,400 gold. So, assuming you have only that 1 province, and build 20 forts, the gold bonus would be slightly bigger than the bonus from Order.
I agree that it's a big bonus - and that 5%/level would still be attractive for anyone wanting to cover their territory with Forts, so maybe 5% instead. But it's hard to imagine circumstances where the 10%/level would be game-breaking.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|

December 7th, 2007, 02:09 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
I'm not certain productivity needs changing, but 30% of unused resources is way too much.
At 400 resources, that's 120 gold a turn.
120 PD is still a long ways off, but 20 isn't.
|

December 7th, 2007, 02:46 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
Well... this is gold that *must* be spent on province defense.
So take a standard empire, and add up all the resources you get, and compare to all the resources you get.
If 10% of your resources = 7% of your total gold, then you could claim that this is somehow equivalent to a level of Order.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|

December 7th, 2007, 06:59 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,055
Thanks: 4
Thanked 29 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
Quote:
DrPraetorious said:
That isn't generally my play style, but okay, no PD degeneration - I agree that anything which increases micromanagement is a non-starter.
KtB - let's assume that you build 20 forts over the entire course of a 50 turn game.
Furthermore, let's assume that every single one of them is a walled city. That's 24,000 gold. Each 10% is 2,400 gold.
Over 50 turns your income from your *capital alone* is 20,000 gold base, each level of order is 1,400 gold. So, assuming you have only that 1 province, and build 20 forts, the gold bonus would be slightly bigger than the bonus from Order.
I agree that it's a big bonus - and that 5%/level would still be attractive for anyone wanting to cover their territory with Forts, so maybe 5% instead. But it's hard to imagine circumstances where the 10%/level would be game-breaking.
|
30% savings on forts is pretty huge since late game, everyone stocks up on forts to protect against remote SC/thugs warping in and running amock. Not to mention an early mage fort is a significant advantage early. Yeah on paper, it doesn't look too bad but trust me, it's pretty big because keep in mind, it will most likely be /combined/ with order 3. It's not about this scale vs that scale in the savings department, it's that you're able to do even more with the abundance of gold you have, not to mention the additional benefits of it. I like either increasing pd idea or just simply stocking up the resources. I mean, military engines don't just simply stop producing armaments during peacetime.
|

December 7th, 2007, 07:29 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lake of Hali, Aldebaran, OH
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 51
Thanked 67 Times in 27 Posts
|
|
Re: Learning to love Resources
I happen to think that you *should* be able to do more with scales in combination - especially in the late game.
If you read the other productivity whining thread, I suggested exactly the benefit you described
It is possible to combine a few really good scales with an awake SC God. Rather, I think, than punishing people for taking some poor scales (which some positions can get away with to a greater or lesser degree as things stand) that it would be better policy to provide a better, multiplicative reward for taking all-good-scales.
__________________
If you read his speech at Rice, all his arguments for going to the moon work equally well as arguments for blowing up the moon, sending cloned dinosaurs into space, or constructing a towering *****-shaped obelisk on Mars. --Randall Munroe
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|