|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 03:01 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sweden 
						Posts: 4,463
					 Thanks: 25 
		
			
				Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Thanks Amhazair    
I'm just looking for particular spells atm, since I think I might be able to fix that. It should be quite simple to change factors on priority, but I don't think I can manage major changes. Thus I want only to know spells that seem to be overly popular. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 03:17 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Alaska 
						Posts: 2,968
					 Thanks: 24 
		
			
				Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Fire flies seems to get prioritized an unfortunate amount. At the very least fire darts should almost always trump it. As mentioned, fire and astral shield are probably too high.
 Also, it doesn't matter much to most players, but it would probably help new players and the AI if all the summon ____power spells were very highly favored.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 03:18 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Wilmington, Delaware, USA 
						Posts: 191
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 13 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 I have to agree w/ summoning, especially after the enemy has routed.  If possible, I'd like gem-cost summoning only if scripted. 
And while I'm wishing, I really would like a blacklist.     I've studied the debugging output... and maybe, hypothetically , some things not entirely  in compliance with the game's licence...    and it doesn't look too hard.  The real question I think is whether it's worth the Devs' time vs. the long list of bugs and other feature requests.
 
To get back on topic, is there any way of reducing the priority of Wooden Warriors/Mass protection when my army is facing an army with a lot of heat/fire effects, Abysia especially?  I can certainly see that adding checks for this one may be too hard.
				__________________ 
				No plan survives contact with the enemy. 
--Helmut von Moltke
 
Have too may pretender files to keep track of? Use catgod  to view them.
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 03:29 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2007 
						Posts: 5,463
					 Thanks: 165 
		
			
				Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Astral shield seems rather high priority too. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 03:54 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Bern, Switzerland 
						Posts: 1,109
					 Thanks: 14 
		
			
				Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Blink should also not get too much priority or at best not be autocasted by the AI at all. It is just not that funny when your yogis (or any other S1 mage i suppose) blinks in the path of retreating enemy archers and gets slain. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 04:35 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 BANNED USER |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2008 
						Posts: 33
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 I'm going to say fire flies and fire darts.  They are pretty useless spells in MA and LA.
 I don't think sermon of courage is a problem.  It seems to be always cast by an indy priest and that is all he can cast and doesn't have the range for melee troops.
 
 Blink should be removed from the AI list.  I do not see it often, only rarely, but I never have seen it used well.  That is a spell for a thug or SC, not some 10 HP unequipped mage.
 
 AI does skelly spam and other undead well.  Elemental summoning is almost always done poorly.
 
 I do not pay attention to buffs that the AI casts so I do not know how applicable they are.
 
 I do not think I see enough long range damage spells other than smite and a very occasional paralyze.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 05:32 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Ghent, Belgium 
						Posts: 1,333
					 Thanks: 39 
		
			
				Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 High level astral mages cast paralyze (at SC's)too often, when soul slay (or enslave mind) would usually be a much better choise.  
 This is in another ballpark as arrow fend and bone grinding and the like of course.  I've never yet seen paralyze overwrite a scripted spell.
 
				__________________ 
				Praeterea censeo, contributoribus magnae auctoritatis e Foro Shrapnelsi frequenter in exsilium eiectis, eos qui verum auxilium petunt melius hoc situ  adiuvari posse.
			 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 06:04 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: guess - and you'll be wrong 
						Posts: 834
					 Thanks: 33 
		
			
				Thanked 187 Times in 66 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Marble Warriors seems to take priority over Army of Gold, strangely.
 Edit: This is not necessarily true, as I was using Army of Gold improperly.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 06:33 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Moscow, Russia 
						Posts: 1,045
					 Thanks: 177 
		
			
				Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 Is it possible to lower priority for gem-using spells in general? This is the reason I need to park gems in some scout/fighter commander & transfer tham to mage each turn - or else hust not use gems...    I don't think that this amount of micromanagement is much fun... |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				April 25th, 2008, 07:09 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: La La Land (California, USA) 
						Posts: 1,244
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: AI spell casting priorities 
 I hate Touch of Madness.  With a passion.  It should never be cast unscripted.I never leave a mage unscripted, but I know that if the AI decides that a nature
 spell is not worth the gems, it will default to Touch of Madness, and send
 archers or mages into the fray.  At the end of the battle, the number of
 casulties precisely matches the number of targeted units.
 
 And not a single gem should be used against a retreating enemy, ever.  What
 really sucks, and I have seen it happen at least once, is when the AI decides
 that it does not need Arrow Fend when I am storming a castle, but once the
 enemy has routed, summoning some Air Elementals is a damn good idea.  Arrow
 Fend, by the way, is one of the spells I'd love to see as "scripted only".
 If you can't be bothered to script it, you should not benefit from it.
 
				__________________No good deed goes unpunished...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |