|
|
|
 |
|

April 2nd, 2009, 04:22 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Battle Graphics Quality - Where U AT ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dedas
Interesting that I get so low FPS with my rather fast system.
|
I suspect that as dom3 graphics are not that fancy, the processor takes way more influence on the framerate than the graphics card, and as phenoms are not that fast, it might explain your low fps.
|

April 2nd, 2009, 04:47 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 72
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Battle Graphics Quality - Where U AT ?
Phenoms aren't slow, look at this chart:
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/common_cpus.html
I have a Phenom 9950 quad core and that is faster than any Intel Core2 duo.
|

April 2nd, 2009, 05:48 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 1,109
Thanks: 14
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
|
|
Re: Battle Graphics Quality - Where U AT ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dedas
|
I think on this benchmark, you can mostly see that 4 cores have more power than 2, but AFAIK dom3 does not support multiple cores, so singlethread performance is what counts, and there core2 is faster than phenom.
Also ATIs drivers might be worse than Nvidias.
|

April 2nd, 2009, 05:53 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Battle Graphics Quality - Where U AT ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dedas
Interesting that I get so low FPS with my rather fast system.
|
Well I wouldn't say it's low, but your numbers should be higher. As mentioned earlier I also recall NVidia having better OpenGL results.
Have you tried stopping some unnecessary services and process then testing again? (I've seen Anti-Virus cause wacky results)
Do you have another operating system on the same hardware you can test?
Do you have the most recent drivers installed for the graphics card?
__________________
There can be only one.
Last edited by NTJedi; April 2nd, 2009 at 05:56 PM..
Reason: OpenGL
|

April 2nd, 2009, 06:12 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Battle Graphics Quality - Where U AT ?
Just checked. With "Too High", 30 fps with grass off, 2.7 - 4 fps with grass on. With Very High, 55 fps grass off, 30 fps grass on. Everything else runs at around 60 fps.
C2D E6600 2.4 GHz, ATI Radeon HD4870 512MB.
|

April 3rd, 2009, 03:39 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lund, Sweden
Posts: 1,377
Thanks: 72
Thanked 25 Times in 20 Posts
|
|
Re: Battle Graphics Quality - Where U AT ?
I see, thank you for the explanation. It doesn't really matter of course, I was just curious. 
|

April 3rd, 2009, 11:15 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Tennessee USA
Posts: 2,059
Thanks: 229
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
|
|
Re: Battle Graphics Quality - Where U AT ?
With grass on, I got ~50 frames on high, ~30 frames on very high, ~4.5-5 frames on too high.
With grass off, I got ~55 on high, ~55 on very high, ~40 on too high.
This setup:
Intel Core 2 Duo 3.16 (Running at 4.05)
4 Gig DDR2 1066 ram
32 gig Solid State Drive (Game and operating system lives here) + various other sata drives
Nvidia Geforce 9800GT (Latest driver installed via Windows 7 updates)
26 Inch Samsung LCD (Running the game at 1280x1024)
__________________
BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH NEXT TURN.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|