|
|
|
|
|
January 1st, 2012, 08:29 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 351
Thanks: 12
Thanked 54 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I'll continue to play while we look for a sub but finding a sub quickly would be best.
|
January 1st, 2012, 09:11 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 78
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Amazing what concentrated FAM can do to an "army". It's been fun, gents, but I'm done for. Enjoy your endgame.
|
January 1st, 2012, 09:46 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Armies can still be viable later on, but depend on buffing spells.
It is however, very hard to defend armies against thunderstrike spam, unless you get decent access to thunder wards.
The other problem you had was being tien Chi, one of the races where Caelum has scant issues with aggressivly entering close combat (immidiatly attacking f.e. Black Plate Flails or Dai Bakemono will hurt comparably frail eagle units much much more, although army of mist changes things quite a bit). Especially if you largely utilize infantry. TCs cavalry is rather cool though, and its numerous attacks are quite efficient in quickly bringing down enemies that to an extent depend on Defense.
I have posted a sub wanted post.
|
January 1st, 2012, 10:17 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 106
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Quote:
Originally Posted by shatner
So, a new year... looking over it I can tell I no longer have the time needed to maintain my current glut of Dom3 games.
|
Sorry to hear this. I will miss a loyal and competent opponent as much as our high-worded correspondence.
I hope you will find the time to come back to the community in the future!
|
January 4th, 2012, 11:01 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Interesting, it appears that Ulm is winning the war against Pythium but loosing the game, although I propably made that choice during pretender creation.
|
January 6th, 2012, 03:45 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
I placed a preventive delay, as both Pythium and Shinuyama indicated to have some heavy real life workloads.
|
January 6th, 2012, 04:30 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 351
Thanks: 12
Thanked 54 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightypeon
I placed a preventive delay, as both Pythium and Shinuyama indicated to have some heavy real life workloads.
|
Much obliged.
|
January 10th, 2012, 07:04 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
A lot happened in this turn, and we may have a found a sub in Numahr, I am delaying things for 72 hours.
|
January 14th, 2012, 09:41 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 449
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
We're coming up on 48 hours until the turn hosts, and the potential sub has had 4 days to look things over. Can we get a decision one way or the other?
|
January 15th, 2012, 04:46 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 435
Thanks: 18
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Pointy Sticks MA started
This is most likely indeed.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|