|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
January 14th, 2022, 01:42 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,955
Thanks: 464
Thanked 1,896 Times in 1,234 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
That means nothing in the scheme of things. Maybe the scenario designer used the Y key to set that specific range, maybe they self-set it as reaction to being fired on, but either way - nothing to worry about. AI will plot them normally for indirect fires. Human can use the Y key if needed.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 14th, 2022, 11:36 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
AH !
This is why I keep copies of old OOB's.
This scenario was built in 2005/2006 so it was built with OOB's that spanned the DOS/Win changeover
Back then the 3 inch mortar in the Indian OOB had a 55 hex range and that = 2750
If you click on the unit and the unit data is shows the correct range and more importantly can only be targeted to the current correct range not the 2750 range
That was based on erroneous information from early on in the OOB development and is supposed to be the max range that late war the Long Range version could obtain but even 55 is too far and the current LR is 51
Why that bit of code is reporting the original range but the game uses the correct range everywhere else is a mystery
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 14th, 2022, 12:05 PM
|
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 788
Thanks: 1,257
Thanked 576 Times in 313 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
In some of mine I have set the range (y) for the AI to help it hurt humans lol.
__________________
ASL
|
January 14th, 2022, 12:24 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
The "solution" in this case is to use Scenhack to "change" those units to their current version and when that is done and saved the scenario will report the correct range that can be used even though the correct range is what is currently being used.. just being reported incorrectly
However, as the original scenario's mortar ranges would have allowed use onto Japanese positions and the reduced range does not I have redeployed those units closer to the lead units to compensate
Last edited by DRG; January 14th, 2022 at 12:33 PM..
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 15th, 2022, 05:33 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Scenario #295 Shafer's bad luck
US Naval Artillery units S0 and S1 are listed as Immobilized landing barges and can't be used for indirect fire.
They are key to any chance of stopping the Tigers
|
The Following User Says Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 15th, 2022, 07:47 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Those units had been borrowed from the USMC OOB and when that scenario was built that slot was occupied by a Naval Fire Support unit that was removed the next year and replaced by the LC
So........ AFAIK you are the first one to mention it in a decade and a half
Corrected now
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 16th, 2022, 05:04 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG
So........ AFAIK you are the first one to mention it in a decade and a half
|
No one picks nit quite like I do.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RetLT For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 16th, 2022, 11:09 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetLT
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG
So........ AFAIK you are the first one to mention it in a decade and a half
|
No one picks nit quite like I do.
|
I am surprised though that Scenhack didn't pick it up given all the times I have run the checks on the scenarios after OOB changes
|
January 18th, 2022, 11:07 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,488
Thanks: 3,957
Thanked 5,691 Times in 2,811 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
RE:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RetLT
Scenario #182 Italian YF defends
Difficulty: Impossible
Size: Medium
Time: Medium
Playable from either side: no
Enjoyability: 1
Can't stop the Matildas. The best you can hope for is a 1:2 draw.
|
I don't like to hear it's impossible unless it was designed to be. In this case, it should not be impossible from the Italian side.
The big problem is in reality this was an Italian victory and there were only Crusaders on the British side.
I won't include this review in the scenario write up as the Matildas have been removed and replaced with Crusaders which changes the dynamics of the scenario
Last edited by DRG; January 19th, 2022 at 08:54 AM..
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|
January 20th, 2022, 12:11 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,152
Thanks: 325
Thanked 1,056 Times in 621 Posts
|
|
Re: RetLT Scenario issues
If you can send me the updated version I can retest it.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|