|
|
|
|
|
March 15th, 2009, 12:44 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
In one game I did cast a global [nature's bounty] successfully, but it didn't show up in the global list. Caster also does not have icon about owning a global. There are still 2 spots left for globals.
Did it happen to anyone before? It's a huge problem.
|
March 15th, 2009, 05:12 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Endoperez
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrispedersen
All the units had gcost = 0, or negative. All had stealth.
|
Sounds very interesting. Any way, what exactly happens with a negative gold cost and upkeep?
|
Well, back then it generated you gold. No idea if it still works.
|
March 15th, 2009, 06:18 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeldor
In one game I did cast a global [nature's bounty] successfully, but it didn't show up in the global list. Caster also does not have icon about owning a global. There are still 2 spots left for globals.
Did it happen to anyone before? It's a huge problem.
|
Yep, happened recently to someone else, but not me. I remember it was the same as what you're saying: two slots open, global cast successfully, but global is missing. It was posted on the forums, but I can't remember if it was this thread, or its own thread.
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
March 16th, 2009, 10:37 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 5,921
Thanks: 194
Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Apparently paralyzed units can still move in order to follow their commander if they have Guard Commander orders.
Sounds quite serious to me!
|
March 16th, 2009, 12:15 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
If the developers are going to take a look at Guard commander,
I'd like to make a request as well, which particularly affects flying units, but affects other units as well, berserkers and tramplers for example.
Many times flyers will 'mill about' to no effective difference of placement.
XYZ
P1Q
RST
RST
Q1Z
ZYP
Each time they do so, they burn fatigue. So many times, by the time an enemy does make it to your commander - flying units will have 60-70 fatigue.
Another notice:
XYZ
P1Q.2
RST
In this circumtance countless times I've seen the troop q wait until 2 comes up to it and hit it - instead of taking one step and hitting 2 first.
And we'd all like archers to fire while guarding (but there are good balance reasons while that doesn't happen).
Here's an algorythm that would improve both these things.
Guards, like troops fill a box, the size of which depends on the number of troops. Ignoring size and the cmd donut, more or less 25 units make a 5x5 box, 16, a 4x4 box.
I presume that right now, guards 'mill' in order to allow them to encounter an enemy, to thus attack, and presumably to avoid blocking a commanders move all the time. My suggestion:
General movement
A. Each size guard box has a fill template (ie., what you do when you have a 5x5 box but only 20 units).
B. When a commander wishes to move, subject to ZOC have all of the units guarding execute an identical move. If the commander doesn't move, (subject to C) the guards execute the same move (ie., they don't).
Combat:
A. Record the size of the box at the start of combat.
B. Allow guards to attack enemy units within a box 2 units larger. So for example, 24 guards are in a box 5x5. Allowing them to move with in a 7x7 box would allow the guards to trigger if an enemy approached within 2.
C. An enemy withing the trigger area causes all guards to move to engage the triggering unit.
Several behaviors this would be good for:
Suppose this was the prefill for 18 guards, guarding (1).
A.B.CD
E.FGH.
IJ1.L.
.MN.oP
.QRS.T
The presence of # within the trigger zone would trigger all the guards to move to engage.
....AB
....ECD
..1.GH#
....IJL
....MN
Etc. ( I didn't put all 18 guards.. but you get the idea)
Now if you were really, REALLY slick, you would have 5-6 guards move to intercept the threat and the remaining guards move to a template position for fewer guards.. something more like
a..b.
.c.deKQ
f.1.gL#
.h.i.MR
k...p
As guards die, they would constantly still surround the commander and still send the others to attack the threat.
The routine would be something like:
(made easier for programming)
for an nxn box of guards with x actual guards
a). Always retain n guards on the commander. (Lowest unit #'s they've been with the commander the longest-).
b. For each triggering enemy, (z) send n guards to deal with it.
Reposition all x-zn guards within the a smaller box, but keep the original size box for purposes of triggering. (The guards fall back to protect the commander).
|
March 16th, 2009, 12:32 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
I've seen troops with missile weapons (archers) fire when set on guard commander during an assassination attempt.
|
March 16th, 2009, 12:50 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Bodyguards behave differently during assassinations. Melee troops will charge the assassin, so I'm not surprised archers will fire.
|
March 17th, 2009, 08:40 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: R'lyeh
Posts: 3,861
Thanks: 144
Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Regarding the recent gold cost fixes, there's still one unit which has a gold cost while its alternate shapechange form has a zero gold cost: The Serpent King's (653) serpent form (654). It's a pretender for Sauromatia, so it's not that much trouble...
|
March 18th, 2009, 05:39 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 177
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Lately in testing Patala the game (3.23) repeatedly crashed when Nagini tried to seduce...
|
March 18th, 2009, 06:27 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Bug Thread: Discussion
Not getting any crashes with a vanilla test game of Patala with 3.23b, so that seems to have been taken care of as well.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|