OMG: The Revenge of the Sith - Page 3

DarkHorse · #21 July 27th, 2004, 03:37 AM

I hope the acronym isn't an omen of the quality of the movie...

Episode III: ROTS

Hugh Manatee · #22 July 27th, 2004, 06:19 AM

Does anyone else want to see Servo and Crow unmothballed long enough to force them to watch the SW prequels?

Loser · #23 July 27th, 2004, 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hugh Manatee:
Does anyone else want to see Servo and Crow unmothballed long enough to force them to watch the SW prequels?

"Oh, no."
"Oh, no!"
"Oh, yeah!"
*Kool-aid man busts through wall*

Atrocities · #24 July 27th, 2004, 08:09 AM

You want to know what really *Pi**es* me off about starwars.com, you have to pay for a forum subscription in order to set up your profile and add or even choose an avatar. THAT IS BULL CRAP!

George Lucas is all about the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ and could care less about the quality of his stories. He is only doing the movies to make $$$$$$$$$$$$$

And yes, Episode III, ROTS is correctly named, Or more correctly "Return of the Stoodges."

I hold absolutely no expectation for this moive after reading about it and seeing all the "shows" that they have made about it. Just another crappy movie to make George Lucas more money.

[ July 27, 2004, 07:11: Message edited by: Atrocities ]

dogscoff · #25 July 27th, 2004, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Although looking back I would rather be placed in a cell with Jar Jar that watch the awful tripe that was Aotc.

Locked in a cell with Jar Jar? Oh yeah, just give me ten minutes...

*dogscoff slips a pool ball into a sock and cracks his knuckles...

[ July 27, 2004, 09:04: Message edited by: dogscoff ]

Atrocities · #26 July 27th, 2004, 10:45 AM

And for the record, the starwars.com forums are a rude place to go. The Moderators lock threads by new people as fast as they post them. The members there are extremely hostile and rude to new members and are as irritating as gasoline in the eyes.

If I were a hacker, with a lot of skill, I would dedicate my life to bring that forum down on principal alone. But I am not a hacker, and for me to say such a thing about any forum means that it is truly a dark depressingly unfriendly place to go.

The fact that you have to PAY to gain access to your member profile should have been proof enough to me that only young, single minded corprate types run the place and we all know how they treaty people.

I was called a NOOBy by some member who obiviously knows little about the real world. I was 8 when Star Wars came out, and I was a teenager when Jedi came out. I think "we" of that generation have the exclusive right to say the things we say about PM and AOTC. Hell my seven year old nephews think PM and AOTC are stupid, but they love SW, ESB, and ROTJ.

Generally any one who Posts anything slightly negative about Star Wars is rapidly attacked and has thier thread locked. It is really a dictatorship there run by mindless and cowardly Moderators who think they are SITH LORDS. This is obviously do to the fact that they are mental retards who believe that the Star Wars universe is real and that George Lucas can do no wrong.

God help the real fans of Star Wars, the silent majority who vote with their pocket books and word of mouth. I was warned not to bother posting at starwars.com by many and I did not listen. For my part I was beaten up pretty bad by the Empire that controls that forum, and even though I fought back, I have no desire to return to such a horrible oppressive place as that.

Please take my word for it, the offical Star Wars forums are as evil as the offical Star Trek ones. They are to be avoided at all costs, less you enjoy being called nooby by a kid that still has no clue about life.

Randallw · #27 July 27th, 2004, 12:33 PM

As I said before Star Wars are my favourite movies and I used the offcial site to keep up to track on new pictures and trailers. Then they invented Hyperspace and expect me to pay to access such stuff. I refuse on principle to coff up the money to look at stuff they used to show free.

dogscoff · #28 July 27th, 2004, 02:18 PM

AT: Let's invade them! As long as we can wreak a certain amount of havoc without having to pay for anything...

Say, one person goes in and starts a thread, and as soon as anyone starts *****ing 20 or 30 shrapnellers all leap violently (and I do mean violently) to their defence. We might all get Banned, but I couldn't care less about that...

Raging Deadstar · #29 July 27th, 2004, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dogscoff:
AT: Let's invade them! As long as we can wreak a certain amount of havoc without having to pay for anything...

Say, one person goes in and starts a thread, and as soon as anyone starts *****ing 20 or 30 shrapnellers all leap violently (and I do mean violently) to their defence. We might all get Banned, but I couldn't care less about that...

I really don't think 20 or 30 shrapnellers would be enough. General Dogscoff Sir

dogscoff · #30 July 27th, 2004, 04:32 PM

Quote:

I really don't think 20 or 30 shrapnellers would be enough. General Dogscoff Sir

Pah! Where's your backbone, soldier? One proud Shrapneller is worth a hundred snivelling SW sciffies. (*) This will be a cake walk. Now stand up straight, get your hair cut, get out there and don't come back until you've got George Lucas himself skewered on the end of that red-hot poker cannon.

* Footnote - except where the Shrapneller also happens to be a SW sciffy. In that case the maths gets a little complicated, but on average it works out at around 4.6 sciffies per Klingon^3.