|
|
|
|
|
August 6th, 2003, 09:43 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Math problem
No, that's not right.
LGM, I didn't mean any offense. I looked at your initial post and didn't think it solved teh problme, but after looking at it again I see it does. Can you explain the math your program is doing to find the solutions? That is what I am trying to figure out.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
August 6th, 2003, 09:47 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Math problem
Only solutions are 3, 7, 15, 31,...
Other numbers of players leave a three some with two players and no one to match them with. Someone demonstrated this earlier with 9 players.
|
August 6th, 2003, 09:49 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Math problem
Sorry slick, this is way over my head.
"The general formula for C(n,r) = n!/[r!(n-r)!]"
What do n and r represent in the formula, and what are the exclamation points for?
And is C(n,r) the total numebr of players needed in the tourney, or the number of games played by each person in the tourney, or something else alltogether?
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
August 6th, 2003, 09:50 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Math problem
Quote:
Originally posted by LGM:
Only solutions are 3, 7, 15, 31,...
Other numbers of players leave a three some with two players and no one to match them with. Someone demonstrated this earlier with 9 players.
|
Right, but other then working them out by hand, or having you plug it into yoru black box and give me the result, can you explain how you know this? What I am trying to learn is not the answer, but how the answer is derived.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
August 6th, 2003, 09:55 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Math problem
Here is the code. Crudely done by brute force in a rather esoteric flavor of basic:
PRIMES = '2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,23,29,31,37,41,43,47,53,59,61 ,67,71,73,79,83,89,97,101,103,109,113,127,131,137'
SWAP ',' WITH @AM IN PRIMES
ILIMIT = DCOUNT(PRIMES,@AM)
PRINT ILIMIT
FOR I = 4 TO ILIMIT
NBR = I
COMBOS = ''
COMBOX = ''
IDX = 1
FOR J = 1 TO I
FOR K = J+1 TO I
FOR L = K+1 TO I
GOSUB FIND.DUPLICATE
IF NOT(FOUND.DUPLICATE) THEN
COMBOS<-1> = PRIMES*PRIMES*PRIMES
COMBOX<-1> = J:',':K:',':L
END
NEXT L
NEXT K
NEXT J
GOSUB CHECK.SOLUTION
NEXT I
PRINT 'DONE'
STOP
*
SOLVED:*
PRINT '---------------------'
PRINT 'SOLVED'
PRINT NBR
FOR M = DCOUNT(COMBOX,@AM) TO 1 STEP -1
PRINT COMBOX
NEXT M
INPUT CH,1_
RETURN
*
CHECK.SOLUTION: *
FOR J = 1 TO I
FOR K = J + 1 TO I
NBR.MATCHES = 0
FOR M = DCOUNT(COMBOS,@AM) TO 1 STEP -1
A.COMBO = COMBOS
IF MOD(A.COMBO,PRIMES)=0 AND MOD(A.COMBO,PRIMES)=0 THEN
NBR.MATCHES = NBR.MATCHES + 1
IF NBR.MATCHES > 1 THEN RETURN
END
NEXT M
IF NBR.MATCHES = 0 THEN RETURN
NEXT K
NEXT J
GOSUB SOLVED
RETURN
*
FIND.DUPLICATE: *
FOUND.DUPLICATE = 0
FOR M = DCOUNT(COMBOS,@AM) TO 1 STEP -1
A.COMBO = COMBOS
J.MOD = MOD(A.COMBO,PRIMES)
K.MOD = MOD(A.COMBO,PRIMES)
L.MOD = MOD(A.COMBO,PRIMES)
IF J.MOD = 0 THEN
IF K.MOD=0 OR L.MOD=0 THEN
FOUND.DUPLICATE = 1
END
END ELSE IF K.MOD=0 AND L.MOD=0 THEN
FOUND.DUPLICATE = 1
END
NEXT M
RETURN
|
August 6th, 2003, 10:01 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Math problem
Ok, so bascially you are having the couputer run through all the possible options fast and see if a number works. Ok, that does the job but isn't really what I was looking for. Mayeb there is no simple mathematical formula for what I am looking for.
Basically I can take x players and group them into games of three players each and see fairly quickly that 7 players will work, but 5 will not. What I was hoping to find was a formula that I could plug the numbers in and be able to tell if a combination of x and y would work without having to go through all teh grouping by hand.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
August 6th, 2003, 10:06 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Math problem
By the way LGM, what is the reason for using the prime numbers in the program? I'm not a programmer so I can't really make heads or tails of your code there, not that it wasn't apprecieated.
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
August 6th, 2003, 10:07 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Math problem
Try X raised to the Yth power and subtract one. Just a theory. I am not sure if that works for 4 or 5 man games yet. X is Number of players per game minus 1. Incidentally, that does not work for 2 players games as any number works for 'round robin' leagues.
|
August 6th, 2003, 10:09 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Math problem
Prime numbers are a nice way to test if something is a member of a set. Products of prime numbers is a common way of encoding sets because you can divide by a given prime. If the remainder is zero, it is an element of the set.
|
August 6th, 2003, 10:12 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Math problem
You could use 21 players (3 sets of 7) with a championship game from the winners of each set.
Or you could use 49 players (7 sets of 7) and have a championship round of the top 7 playing each of the top 7.
[ August 06, 2003, 21:13: Message edited by: LGM ]
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|