|
|
|
|
|
March 22nd, 2004, 07:46 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Blacksburg, VA, USA
Posts: 274
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
Quote:
Originally posted by jaif:
Forgive me, but I have to ask - where's the balance in this new nation? Don't get me wrong, I think there should be a Persian/Arab influenced nation in the game, but what's described in this thread sounds like it has no weaknesses and several strengths.
|
Fire as one of the nation's primary magic paths isn't enough of a weakness for you?
I don't see it as having any particularly impressive strengths. Nothing with heavy armor, no crossbows or longbows, primary magic path is weak, average at best priests. Cavalry are always expensive and only sometimes worth it. The seducing unit might be good, but probably not as good as a well equipped assassin - a more limited choice of targets and probably a lower success rate. (Although it would be interesting if, when a courtesan fails to seduce someone and has to fight them instead, the target doesn't get any of his armor during the fight... )
It might be fun to play, but I wouldn't expect it to be a serious contender against the likes of Arcoscephale, Pythium, Caelum or Jotunheim.
__________________
People do not like to be permanently transformed and would probably revolt against masters that tried to curse them with iron bodies.
Pigs, on the other hand, are not bothered, or at least they don't complain.
-- Dominions II spell manual
|
March 22nd, 2004, 07:58 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 477
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
Jaif has a point about balance.
Flying mages, excellent assassins, effective cavalry, powerful summons, stealthy troops, sacred dervishes. All pretty good.
One obvious place to make up the balance points would be with weak priests. Spread the faith through conquest, rather than preaching. Seems in keeping with the theme.
|
March 22nd, 2004, 08:17 PM
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
It would be hard to say if it's balanced or not without the particulars. Maybe each Djinn costs 30 Air and are barely reasonable for that cast. Maybe the Fire and Air of the mages is minute. Maybe the cavalry are expensive and don't fight well.
I'd wait to pass judgement on balance until you can see what is there, then you can go from there.
|
March 22nd, 2004, 08:48 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 2,487
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
It sounds very interesting to me, especially in light of the myth-laden flavor inherent in the idea. It should fit in marvelously with the already existing nations (which isn't a necessity, but it always nice) and have something unique to offer.
|
March 23rd, 2004, 01:12 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
Well when I originally posted the suggestion, I pictured the "Djinn Warrior" as a fighter/mage hybrid, and not *NEARLY* as powerful as, for example, Al Khazim. That would be overpowered.
Otherwise, I dont see this as being overpowered, at least without TOO much national summons.
Weaknesses would include:
- low armor
- no non-random earth, death, blood, nature, water.
- no heavy-hitting units (scimtar wielders and dervishes are the closest that come to it)
Should things still be too powerful, one could always nerf this or that or crank up the prices of some units.
Wouldnt go camel archers, and certainly not with two archers per camel -- sounds like moose riders to me, which I really neither understand nor like either. (A size 4 moose? Please. And two riders? Good luck hitting the side of a barn.)
In general, as someone pointed out, it sounds a lot like Pangaia (which is generally not considered overpowered) or a cross between them and Van and Machaka.
I still like the mish-mash idea, where the capital city (I picture a cross between Alexandria and Constantinople) is one in which scholars and sages gather and civilization has its peak, although the dark temples still harbor the mystic exstatic cults of the dervishes,
and the twilight culture of the sand dwellers is found on the outskirts.
|
March 23rd, 2004, 01:32 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
I probably could have phrased my question better, but my personal philosophy when designing things like this (nations in strategy games) is to a) think of the general theme), b) detail their cool stuff, and c) detail their weaknesses. With those three elements of the design fully stated, it makes it easier to flesh out the details.
I just wanted to incorporate weaknesses into the discussion, and I've seen a number of good replies.
-Jeff
|
March 24th, 2004, 02:20 AM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,177
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
Quote:
Originally posted by jaif:
c) detail their weaknesses.
|
Well, I can only speak on behalf of my own "1001 Nights" mod, but it has weaknesses, and is much less powerful than the base Arco it's built on.
The main weakness is the lack of reliable infantry. The main line infantry is basically Cardaces, the best infantry type is the Janissary bowman who is very close to the base T'ien Ch'i Imperial Archer, with less protection (8), a strat move of 2 and a 2-handed scimitar (a toned-down greatsword). All that for 16 gold apiece. There's a 3rd infantry type, the 'Harem guards', who are giant eunuchs (giant here only means they have 13 hp instead of the regular 10 - think of Hollywood peplums), armed with the same great scimitars but even worse protection than the Janissaries. That's all for infantry as there are no dervishes in my mod.
Colorful, but not really earth-shattering infantry IMO. Its only saving grace is it's resource-cheap.
__________________
God does not play dice, He plays Dominions Albert von Ulm
|
March 24th, 2004, 04:20 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
Quote:
Originally posted by tinkthank:
As to the Courtesan: d'accord. (And of course I never pictured her being able to seduce undead, Minoutaurs, or whatnot; size 2 humans only. She would and should and must be inferior to the succubus in every way.)
|
Can succubi seduce undead or minotaurs????? To my knowledge they can't even seduce eunuchs...
|
March 24th, 2004, 04:34 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
KO wrote:
"Size 4 beings can not be seduced. Neither can lifeless beings, undeads, females, eunuchs, animals nor Heart Companions."
Note that it doesn't succeed very often. Resisted by both Magic Resistance and Morale, IIRC. The succubus then fights and usually has little problem. A non-demonic seductress would probably not make a good assassin, so that would be a major difference in their effectiveness compared to a succubus.
The teleportation home is a stretch though - perhaps a reason then to make them somehow require gems, or be expensive, to account for the magic required to get them home.
PvK
|
March 25th, 2004, 02:05 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Suggestion for a new nation
Yes, Courtesans should be vastly inferior to succubi as combatants but decent seductresses to male humans. And they bring the commanders "home" not by flying (dont forget: the Succubus seduces non-flying creatures as well, and no commander in the game grants other commanders flying abilities; and a succubus can bring commanders back from over 50 provinces away, and noone flies that fast) but rather under that commander's own power. The fact that they could move 15 squares per turn or whatever just needs to be fictionalized away.
Side note: The term "Vizier" I used because the translation of 1001 Nights I have translates the title of Scheherezad's father as "Wesir", which is pretty much a 1-to-1 rendering of the word in German. Dont know what it was in the original.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|