New cover? - Page 3

Nerfix · #21 October 16th, 2003, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Richard:
The full cover, with the stuff on the back, looks freaking awesome. This is our artists best cover to date. The old cover was just something we put up quickly to get the product pages up.

I like the cover, but i still say that it should have been "Dominions II", not "Dominions 2".

Psitticine · #22 October 16th, 2003, 02:48 PM

As a matter of fact, it should say Dominions II instead of 2. That's been decided as the official title.

Psitticine, the Fussy Editing Parrot

Nerfix · #23 October 16th, 2003, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Psitticine:
As a matter of fact, it should say Dominions II instead of 2. That's been decided as the official title.

Psitticine, the Fussy Editing Parrot

Can it still be fixed?
This is the only thing that bothers me in the cover, and since it should be Dominions II not 2...

Aristoteles · #24 October 16th, 2003, 03:43 PM

LOL, who cares about that? II. or 2.
Geez!

Endoperez · #25 October 16th, 2003, 04:19 PM

I do! Of course, this is not important, but I still like II more than 2. It is a question of style. Dominions is more in the old than in the new, and II is older than 2. Well, I do not know any years, but II would have been used in the time Rome was the important nation. That is, before the cataclysm.

Besides, II is more exotic than 2. For me atleast.

-Storm- · #26 October 16th, 2003, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Endoperez:
I do! Of course, this is not important, but I still like II more than 2. It is a question of style. Dominions is more in the old than in the new, and II is older than 2. Well, I do not know any years, but II would have been used in the time Rome was the important nation. That is, before the cataclysm.
Besides, II is more exotic than 2. For me atleast.

Dominions 2 is fine. I don't see any difference between 2 and II. This is all about subjectivity.

Psitticine · #27 October 16th, 2003, 04:27 PM

Branding is important, and consistancy is a part of that. The title of the game should remain the same, no matter where or when it is referenced.

Saber Cherry · #28 October 16th, 2003, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by -Storm-:
Dominions 2 is fine. I don't see any difference between 2 and II. This is all about subjectivity.

One is Arabic, one is Roman. That sounded strange, I guess I should say 2 is Arabic, II is Roman. And Shrapnel typically sells more games in Europe than in the Middle East, so it's pretty important

st.patrik · #29 October 16th, 2003, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Saber Cherry:

quote:
Originally posted by -Storm-:
Dominions 2 is fine. I don't see any difference between 2 and II. This is all about subjectivity.

One is Arabic, one is Roman. That sounded strange, I guess I should say 2 is Arabic, II is Roman. And Shrapnel typically sells more games in Europe than in the Middle East, so it's pretty important

lol

MStavros · #30 October 16th, 2003, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Saber Cherry:

quote:
Originally posted by -Storm-:
Dominions 2 is fine. I don't see any difference between 2 and II. This is all about subjectivity.

One is Arabic, one is Roman. That sounded strange, I guess I should say 2 is Arabic, II is Roman. And Shrapnel typically sells more games in Europe than in the Middle East, so it's pretty important

........so I guess you are using II. in Japan....and I guess the Europeans are using II. instead of 2....is that what you are trying to tell us?

(Shrugs)