|
|
|
|
|
June 8th, 2003, 09:57 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Gravity is constant in that the rate of change of the force due to gravity is constant.
|
June 8th, 2003, 09:59 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
I think you need to study anti-logic to quantify Fryon.
PvK
|
June 8th, 2003, 10:28 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
Gravity is constant in that the rate of change of the force due to gravity is constant.
|
That only works in specialized circumstances; perhaps gravity is constant in that that G, the gravitational constant, is constant.
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
|
June 8th, 2003, 10:47 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,227
Thanks: 7
Thanked 44 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Well, I'm definately a 'Constant', and that's alot better than being a 'Variable' IHMO.
hmmm,.. but then again my post count is always changing, so I might be a 'variable' disguised as a 'constant'.
Come to think of it, many of the people here would best be described as 'Regulars',..
So I'm happy to announce I'm a regular guy.
Cheers!
P.S. I thought Gravity was 'relitive' not 'constant'. And if I'm not wrong it's relitive to mass, right?
[ June 08, 2003, 21:49: Message edited by: David E. Gervais ]
|
June 8th, 2003, 11:07 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Force from gravity is relative, sure:
F = G((M * m)/(d^2))
Where F is the magnitude of the force due to gravity, G is the gravitational constant (it is only sort of constant, as it depends on the units used), M and m are the two masses involved and d is the distance between the two masses. The direction is towards the other object.
Also, as Acceleration = Force/Mass, the acceleration is also relative.
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
|
June 9th, 2003, 12:43 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Quote:
Originally posted by David E. Gervais:
Well, I'm definately a 'Constant', and that's alot better than being a 'Variable' IHMO.
hmmm,.. but then again my post count is always changing, so I might be a 'variable' disguised as a 'constant'.
Come to think of it, many of the people here would best be described as 'Regulars',..
|
Yeah, a variable can be static, or it can be const, and also a variable can be a member.
|
June 9th, 2003, 05:04 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 738
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
In this forum, you can be bailed out at any given time when you stumble into a scientific discussion. Gotta love it!
|
June 9th, 2003, 06:12 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Quote:
Originally posted by PvK:
I think you need to study anti-logic to quantify Fryon.
PvK
|
Not sure who this Fryon is... but it is quite impossible to quantify a person.
|
June 9th, 2003, 07:22 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Is the gravitational constant really constant?
|
June 9th, 2003, 07:39 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: # of members ?
Quote:
Originally posted by Kamog:
Is the gravitational constant really constant?
|
To the best of my knoweledge, within a given system of units (e.g. metric: meters, seconds, kilograms; "English": feet, seconds, slugs) the gravitational constant is constant. However, we have only had the tools to measure it for a fairly short period of time, and only on Earth.
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|