|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

November 27th, 2011, 11:20 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Hi,
Turn 36-44:
US tanks are stuck and, we decide to let them their...
Few US soldiers still fighting along the road, but nothing serious.
US HQ is found on the road! The T-34/85 take care of them.
Soviet forces reach the second bridge.
Few US mortar can be targeted and that's what we do.
Unfortunatly, a lone Bazooka shoot and destroy a ZSU-16.
Soon, all flags are ours and we win the fight!
Thank you,
-Luc-
|

November 28th, 2011, 03:49 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Hi,
My analysis of the battle:
Despite their superior quality and quantity, Americans misused their potential. Their frontal assault was a complete failure.
Their tanks (M26 and M46) were better than ours and could have been a serious problem for us. We believe that a lack of synergy explains the failure.Their infantry were also better. Often, their results were higher than ours, and despite that ours positions (top of hill) was better. Thus, they were able to approach and destroyed many of our tanks.Our infantry also tends to run away often and stuck under mortar fire. Their artillery, even fewer than ours, has been well used.
Our biggest problem is the transport of infantry. The trucks cant follow the tanks. Our tanks are becoming vulnerable.
During the next battle, we need to use better both, even lossing a tank quality, the movement.
Overall, we will maintain our strategy seems to be effective. Bombing, recognize, concentrate forces, bombing and attack.
Is it the Blitzkrieg?
Thank you,
-Luc-
|

November 28th, 2011, 05:10 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Quote:
Originally Posted by -Luc-
Is it the Blitzkrieg?
|
In essence Blitzkrieg involves poking a hole in your opponents front line then spreading out behind his front line and destroying support and supply units to make the rest of his units/positions vulnerable. The second (behind the opponents lines) part is the real "destruction" caused by the Blitzkrieg type attack.
Given that WinSPMBT deals primarily with front line type units rather then support types you're performing the "hole poking" part of a Blitzkrieg but not the "rampage behind the lines" part.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|

December 3rd, 2011, 12:54 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Hi,
Location: St arsbourg?;
Date: 1948/08;
Enemy: France;
Mission: Assault;
Visibility: 20;
Turns: 90;
No big change in my TO&E:
HQ support infantry is now an SMG section,
In support I have:
1X RECCE plane
3X IL-10 with 100kg bombs.
Map of battlefield:
Soviet task force:
4 RECCE section will follow the dirt road.
PT-34 and T-34/85 follow them 250m behind and will be ready to begin the fight.
Infantries will stay 250m behind tanks in their trucks.
***
At the first crossroad, the force will turn to the south and after, to the west in direction of the hill.
T-34/85 BTU and a platoon of infantries will secure the crossroad.
The hill is our first objective; this is highest point and from there, we will dominate the situation...
Our mortars and guns will prepare the battlefield for tanks and infantries.
Thank you,
-Luc-
|

December 5th, 2011, 11:28 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Hi,
TURN 5: The RECCE plane see some troops...
We regroup and plan our attack.
RECCE troops open the way followed by tanks and infantries.
The fight begin!
French infantries are tought because:
A lot of mens (13) in each sections;
A lot of bazookas units and in infantries sections;
Their trenchs give them a good protection.
More infantries are there than expected; the plane didnt saw everything...
We push hard, move foward, but we loose many mens and waste a lot of munitions.
Mines are discovered... Their 81mm mortars start firing...
The fight is hard and we losed a first tank.
Thank you,
-Luc-
|

December 7th, 2011, 12:21 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Dug in infantry can be very difficult to dislodge in WinSPMBT; nearly impossible to suppress and they seem to hit at least twice as often/hard as the attackers. I frequently find it necessary to resupply ammo after using everything a platoon (often two) has suppressing just one dug-in position enough I can get an infantry unit to it and assault ... seems to be the only reliable way to dislodge them. On rare occasions one will break and leave it's position or be destroyed by fire prior to an assault but it's not something to count on.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|

December 7th, 2011, 01:50 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Hi,
Youre right Suhiir...
Turn 5-37:
The Soviet forces put lot of pressure on the French.
The fight is difficult but we can advance a little bit each turn.
French mortars are deadly; an infantry section reinforcement and a AA unit are destroyed.
We spot smoke and call for air support: the sky is clear!? Few turn later, Il-10s drop 2 100kg bombs on each mortar.
On the ground, things are difficult: we loose another tank and many mens.
Soviet engineer open a way in mines field under heavy fire from the enemy on their flank.
Troops are exhausted and artillery will soon run out of ammunitions.
Carefully, we reach the small town who was almost empty; we take positions and will wait for reinforcement...
Unfortunately, the tank of Major Baturin run in mines and being imobilized.
Thank you,
-Luc-
|

December 8th, 2011, 02:07 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Hi,
Turn 38-END
Small town secured and soviet reinforcement arrived: we can move to our next objective: crossroad to the west.
After we sized the crossroad, french start attacking!
They put a lot of presure everywhere we are, espacially on the small town we captured.
We lost 2 infantry sections, 2 White scout cars, 2 MGs and a GAZ-69 during that very hard fight.
Major Baturin, 1 infantry section, the FO team and the crew of ammo crate resist; they are warheroes...
At the crossroad, this is the same thing... but the fresh troops, with tank support, still in position.
After that, everything become quiet and we sized every objectives points...
That one was hard...
Thank you,
-Luc-
|

December 8th, 2011, 11:02 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hellas->Macedonia->Thessaloniki->City Center->noisy neighbourhood
Posts: 1,359
Thanks: 307
Thanked 128 Times in 87 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Well done. Interesting.
When I have to go through such defenses I usually place smoke in two parallel lines crossing the defenses and bomb (arti) the **** out of the units in that "corridor". With a couple of turns of heavy bombing and a couple of fast but good against infantry, vehicles/apcs, I approach the "corridor" and try to make the enemy troops use any will to fight. Then I bring in the heavy equipment and just break through with ease. Just make sure when you approach your units to shift the artillery to up and down of the "corridor" so that it suppresses any enemy units thinking of moving towards it, but not close enough to be a risk to your own units crossing it. If you have any infantry available (scouts or engineers) with those first vehicles you approach, they can help to hold the now empty trenches even after your tanks have crossed. But that's just me.
__________________
That's it, keep dancing on the minefield!
|

December 15th, 2011, 02:34 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 105
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: CCCP vs NATO long campaign (1948-1991)
Hi,
Thank you Wdll, I'll try that next time!
My analysis of the battle:
My biggest surprise was the resistance offered by the French infantry. The large number of soldiers and anti-tank weapons was beyond expectations. Removing these troops from their trenches was more difficult tahn expected and required a lot of effort and ammunition...
The absence of anti-aircraft weapons was also a surprise. This allowed me to use the airspace without danger. Destruction by IL-10 of the enemy artillery was very helpful. The spotter plane helped a lot too.
After two battles, I realize that the opponent neglect some elements for a large number of troops... strange ...
Still, the battle has been hard.
Thank you,
-Luc-
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|