|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
 |
|

March 11th, 2015, 08:09 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,615
Thanks: 4,057
Thanked 5,815 Times in 2,869 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
It's set to "Fixed" in the copy I uploaded on the 10th......
I've deleted the first version I posted on the 9th so I can't check. Who knows, that may have been the only problem with it. As I said. I've never actually built a campaign before just maintained the scenarios so I didn't double check the set up of the original ASSUMING it was as the original developer intended
Last edited by DRG; March 11th, 2015 at 08:21 AM..
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DRG For This Useful Post:
|
|

March 11th, 2015, 10:24 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
So far so good. 1st scenario working with no surprises. We won't know about incorrect vehicle sprites until about 2nd or 3rd battle, which is where I started to see ZSU-23/4s looking like mobile SAMs.
|

March 11th, 2015, 11:10 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,615
Thanks: 4,057
Thanked 5,815 Times in 2,869 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
The all should be corrected. I went through each scenario with Scenhack. The only issue might be for you is if I used an icon that exists in my files but not yours until the update is released but I don't think this will be the case
|

March 12th, 2015, 05:22 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,615
Thanks: 4,057
Thanked 5,815 Times in 2,869 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
Well there have been 26 DL's..... don't be shy, a little feedback goes a long way. We know the first scenario works
|

March 13th, 2015, 06:53 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,615
Thanks: 4,057
Thanked 5,815 Times in 2,869 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juramentado
So far so good. 1st scenario working with no surprises. We won't know about incorrect vehicle sprites until about 2nd or 3rd battle, which is where I started to see ZSU-23/4s looking like mobile SAMs.
|
I found them. Scenhack doesn't check inappropriate Icons. Unzip this to your Campaigns folder, it fixes Icon issues in the second and fifth scenarios of that campaign
|

March 13th, 2015, 06:25 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
Perfect timing, I'm just about to roll over to Scenario # 2.
|

March 13th, 2015, 11:05 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
Finished 2nd and 3rd - I think I was on the 5th or 6th using the original campaign files so I'm getting closer to where I was before. So far, so good. No showstoppers that I can find.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Juramentado For This Useful Post:
|
|

March 14th, 2015, 02:18 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 37
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
Hi Don,
So far pretty good. I lost count - this is either 4th or 5th battle in, and I noticed this unit roaming the field. It looks like a weps carrier, but the description reads 83mm mortar (3). I've included the info file. Does this make sense or another sprite problem?
Thanks!
-Armando
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Juramentado For This Useful Post:
|
|

March 14th, 2015, 02:35 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,615
Thanks: 4,057
Thanked 5,815 Times in 2,869 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
I will look into it
|

March 14th, 2015, 02:47 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,615
Thanks: 4,057
Thanked 5,815 Times in 2,869 Posts
|
|
Re: CENTAG 78 still ok under latest version
It's supposed to be a mortar unit. When the campaign was created it was but that unit was removed and replaced at some point.
Correction attached
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|