Aquarium - Started - FIGHT! - Page 30

jimkehn · #**291** September 1st, 2008, 05:09 PM

My sincere apologies to Mictlan and R'lyeh for the Lord of the Hunt's behavior. Unfortunately, I am not sure why he insists on attacking my friend, and not my enemies. I thought he would attack priests of the nations I am at war with. Evidently not.

JimMorrison · #**292** September 2nd, 2008, 03:42 AM

So Aquarium hosted - I haven't even opened the turn, as I am still anticipating a rollback.

The current turn is set at a 24h interval. I can foresee multiple stales. We need to fix this.

I won't be submitting a turn until the situation is under control.

llamabeast · #**293** September 2nd, 2008, 04:53 AM

Quote:

New turn file: Aquarium, R'lyeh turn 66‏
From: turns@llamaserver.net (turns@llamaserver.net)
Sent: Sat 8/30/08 6:28 PM

Reminder: Aquarium hosting in 6 hours‏
From: turns@llamaserver.net (turns@llamaserver.net)
Sent: Mon 9/01/08 12:29 PM

These two turns are 48 hours apart, not 12. What do you mean?

Also it's set at a 48 hour interval, not 24 hours.

JimMorrison · #**294** September 2nd, 2008, 07:09 AM

Dear lord. This one is even worse than the Stasis problem..... All I can say is, I've been really ill the last few days, and not entirely myself. Blah.

<3

llamabeast · #**295** September 2nd, 2008, 08:28 AM

Not a problem. I hope you're feeling better.

sum1lost · #**296** September 9th, 2008, 01:13 PM

I would like to rollback, please. Eriu has gone AI and was able to jump a turn in a fashion that was highly unexpected.

JimMorrison · #**297** September 9th, 2008, 08:45 PM

I'm having a hard time seeing where Eriu actually was capable of doing anything dastardly enough to warrant a rollback more than any of the mundane difficulties caused by the stale. Yes, they took a VP from you. I'm pretty sure it should be easy enough to recapture. Seems like someone asking for the rollback because they had barbarians or troglodytes spawn somewhere inconvenient.

Granted, I am sure you want to sew this game up ASAP - it does look like we'll be unable to stop you. But rolling back to avert the loss of that VP will actually only make things take longer, than moving ahead from where we are now.

sum1lost · #**298** September 9th, 2008, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimMorrison

I'm having a hard time seeing where Eriu actually was capable of doing anything dastardly enough to warrant a rollback more than any of the mundane difficulties caused by the stale. Yes, they took a VP from you. I'm pretty sure it should be easy enough to recapture. Seems like someone asking for the rollback because they had barbarians or troglodytes spawn somewhere inconvenient.

Granted, I am sure you want to sew this game up ASAP - it does look like we'll be unable to stop you. But rolling back to avert the loss of that VP will actually only make things take longer, than moving ahead from where we are now.

There are some other things that did not work like they were meant to because of that, but I'd rather not share them. A rollback would actually save time, because this turn is identical to the last one- we have to redo all of the orders.

JimMorrison · #**299** September 9th, 2008, 09:16 PM

Right, and if you read the Llamaserver email, you can't just upload the old one. You have to redo the moves either way. So it takes extra time, because we have to get the old turn back.

I had an army sit in a swamp and get riddled with disease, and I'm still against a rollback.

sum1lost · #**300** September 9th, 2008, 09:33 PM

Ah. I did not know it couldn't simply be rehosted. Thank you for clarifying.